《骗我一次:美国诉阿列尼科夫案和2012年《商业秘密盗窃澄清法》》

Robert Damion Jurrens
{"title":"《骗我一次:美国诉阿列尼科夫案和2012年《商业秘密盗窃澄清法》》","authors":"Robert Damion Jurrens","doi":"10.15779/Z388H7C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Note analyzes the effect of the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act (\"TTSCA\"), and argues that Congress should continue to cast a watchful eye on the Economic Espionage Act (\"EEA\"). Section I examines the EEA in detail, including its rocky history with the void for vagueness doctrine. Section II details the plight of Sergey Aleynikov and his arduous path through the federal court system, culminating in his recent arrest under New York State law. Section III examines the TTSCA’s scope and the unintended concomitant confusion it created in Agrawal — tried under one version of the EEA, but likely to be decided under another ex post facto. Finally, Section IV analyzes potential outcomes in the Agrawal case and argues that federal preemption is crucial to the healthy operation of the EEA. In order to ensure justice under the EEA, federal preemption — rather than the uncertainty of a mixed bag of state statutes — is necessary.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fool Me Once: U.S. v. Aleynikov and the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012\",\"authors\":\"Robert Damion Jurrens\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z388H7C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Note analyzes the effect of the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act (\\\"TTSCA\\\"), and argues that Congress should continue to cast a watchful eye on the Economic Espionage Act (\\\"EEA\\\"). Section I examines the EEA in detail, including its rocky history with the void for vagueness doctrine. Section II details the plight of Sergey Aleynikov and his arduous path through the federal court system, culminating in his recent arrest under New York State law. Section III examines the TTSCA’s scope and the unintended concomitant confusion it created in Agrawal — tried under one version of the EEA, but likely to be decided under another ex post facto. Finally, Section IV analyzes potential outcomes in the Agrawal case and argues that federal preemption is crucial to the healthy operation of the EEA. In order to ensure justice under the EEA, federal preemption — rather than the uncertainty of a mixed bag of state statutes — is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z388H7C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z388H7C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了《商业秘密盗窃澄清法》(“TTSCA”)的影响,并认为国会应继续关注《经济间谍法》(“EEA”)。第一部分详细考察了欧洲经济区,包括其不稳定的历史与空白的模糊主义。第二部分详细描述了谢尔盖·阿列尼科夫的困境,以及他在联邦法院系统的艰难历程,最终在最近根据纽约州法律被逮捕。第三部分考察了TTSCA的范围以及它在Agrawal案中无意中造成的混淆——在一个版本的EEA下进行审判,但很可能在另一个事后决定。最后,第四部分分析了Agrawal案的潜在结果,并认为联邦优先权对EEA的健康运作至关重要。为了确保EEA下的公正,联邦政府的先发制人——而不是各州法律混杂的不确定性——是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fool Me Once: U.S. v. Aleynikov and the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012
This Note analyzes the effect of the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act ("TTSCA"), and argues that Congress should continue to cast a watchful eye on the Economic Espionage Act ("EEA"). Section I examines the EEA in detail, including its rocky history with the void for vagueness doctrine. Section II details the plight of Sergey Aleynikov and his arduous path through the federal court system, culminating in his recent arrest under New York State law. Section III examines the TTSCA’s scope and the unintended concomitant confusion it created in Agrawal — tried under one version of the EEA, but likely to be decided under another ex post facto. Finally, Section IV analyzes potential outcomes in the Agrawal case and argues that federal preemption is crucial to the healthy operation of the EEA. In order to ensure justice under the EEA, federal preemption — rather than the uncertainty of a mixed bag of state statutes — is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信