用于井眼轨迹不确定性计算的高级样条曲线蒙特卡罗分析

K. Mckenna, A. Eustes, M. Abughaban, M. Shahri
{"title":"用于井眼轨迹不确定性计算的高级样条曲线蒙特卡罗分析","authors":"K. Mckenna, A. Eustes, M. Abughaban, M. Shahri","doi":"10.2118/194085-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The wellbore position uncertainty model is an important part of well design and operational considerations particularly for multi-well pads. The true uncertainty ellipsoids are dependent on the wellbore trajectory calculation method as much as it is on the quality of the survey measurements. Using the advanced spline curve method, more accurate uncertainty ellipsoids can be generated enabling engineers to optimize wellbore position for drilling, geological, reservoir, and production engineering applications.\n To demonstrate that the advanced spline curve method models the true wellbore position more accurately than minimum curvature, trajectory calculations of a well surveyed with high resolution continuous gyroscope measurements are compared with the same wellbore after down sampling. The error of the two methods with the down sampled survey are compared to the base case. With the advanced spline curve method established, the uncertainty ellipsoid is calculated for each survey station for a set of wells on a multi-well pad. A Monte Carlo simulation using an industry standard error model for the survey measurements generated the uncertainty ellipsoids. The confidence interval, agreement of distribution, and collision risk of both calculation methods are evaluated and compared to a high-resolution survey.\n This paper presents a Monte Carlo analysis of the wellbore position error model generated by the advanced spline curve method to that of the error model generated by the minimum curvature method. The error induced by the calculation method is reduced loosening the constraint of collision risk on wellbore design. Improved knowledge of the wellbore position benefits all engineering aspects for the life of the well.","PeriodicalId":441797,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","volume":"2017 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo Analysis of Advanced Spline Curves for Wellbore Trajectory Uncertainty Calculations\",\"authors\":\"K. Mckenna, A. Eustes, M. Abughaban, M. Shahri\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194085-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The wellbore position uncertainty model is an important part of well design and operational considerations particularly for multi-well pads. The true uncertainty ellipsoids are dependent on the wellbore trajectory calculation method as much as it is on the quality of the survey measurements. Using the advanced spline curve method, more accurate uncertainty ellipsoids can be generated enabling engineers to optimize wellbore position for drilling, geological, reservoir, and production engineering applications.\\n To demonstrate that the advanced spline curve method models the true wellbore position more accurately than minimum curvature, trajectory calculations of a well surveyed with high resolution continuous gyroscope measurements are compared with the same wellbore after down sampling. The error of the two methods with the down sampled survey are compared to the base case. With the advanced spline curve method established, the uncertainty ellipsoid is calculated for each survey station for a set of wells on a multi-well pad. A Monte Carlo simulation using an industry standard error model for the survey measurements generated the uncertainty ellipsoids. The confidence interval, agreement of distribution, and collision risk of both calculation methods are evaluated and compared to a high-resolution survey.\\n This paper presents a Monte Carlo analysis of the wellbore position error model generated by the advanced spline curve method to that of the error model generated by the minimum curvature method. The error induced by the calculation method is reduced loosening the constraint of collision risk on wellbore design. Improved knowledge of the wellbore position benefits all engineering aspects for the life of the well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019\",\"volume\":\"2017 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194085-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194085-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

井眼位置不确定性模型是井设计和作业考虑的重要组成部分,特别是对于多井平台。真正的不确定椭球取决于井眼轨迹的计算方法,也取决于测量结果的质量。使用先进的样条曲线方法,可以生成更精确的不确定性椭球体,使工程师能够优化钻井、地质、油藏和生产工程应用的井眼位置。为了证明先进的样条曲线法比最小曲率法更准确地模拟了真实的井筒位置,将采用高分辨率连续陀螺仪测量的井眼轨迹计算结果与下采样后的同一井眼轨迹计算结果进行了比较。对两种方法在下采样情况下的误差进行了比较。在建立了先进的样条曲线法的基础上,对多井区的一组井进行了各测点不确定椭球的计算。蒙特卡罗模拟使用工业标准误差模型的调查测量产生不确定椭球。评估了两种计算方法的置信区间、分布一致性和碰撞风险,并与高分辨率调查进行了比较。将先进样条曲线法生成的井眼位置误差模型与最小曲率法生成的误差模型进行蒙特卡罗分析。该方法减小了计算误差,降低了碰撞风险对井筒设计的约束。提高对井眼位置的了解,对井的整个生命周期都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monte Carlo Analysis of Advanced Spline Curves for Wellbore Trajectory Uncertainty Calculations
The wellbore position uncertainty model is an important part of well design and operational considerations particularly for multi-well pads. The true uncertainty ellipsoids are dependent on the wellbore trajectory calculation method as much as it is on the quality of the survey measurements. Using the advanced spline curve method, more accurate uncertainty ellipsoids can be generated enabling engineers to optimize wellbore position for drilling, geological, reservoir, and production engineering applications. To demonstrate that the advanced spline curve method models the true wellbore position more accurately than minimum curvature, trajectory calculations of a well surveyed with high resolution continuous gyroscope measurements are compared with the same wellbore after down sampling. The error of the two methods with the down sampled survey are compared to the base case. With the advanced spline curve method established, the uncertainty ellipsoid is calculated for each survey station for a set of wells on a multi-well pad. A Monte Carlo simulation using an industry standard error model for the survey measurements generated the uncertainty ellipsoids. The confidence interval, agreement of distribution, and collision risk of both calculation methods are evaluated and compared to a high-resolution survey. This paper presents a Monte Carlo analysis of the wellbore position error model generated by the advanced spline curve method to that of the error model generated by the minimum curvature method. The error induced by the calculation method is reduced loosening the constraint of collision risk on wellbore design. Improved knowledge of the wellbore position benefits all engineering aspects for the life of the well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信