Sh. S. Turyskeldi, Z. Sametova, A. K. Usembay, Y. Bulatov
{"title":"新型seplife®lx-mc-dex1微载体与现有微载体培养细胞和病毒的结果比较","authors":"Sh. S. Turyskeldi, Z. Sametova, A. K. Usembay, Y. Bulatov","doi":"10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.","PeriodicalId":307725,"journal":{"name":"Biosafety and Biotechnology","volume":"49 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS\",\"authors\":\"Sh. S. Turyskeldi, Z. Sametova, A. K. Usembay, Y. Bulatov\",\"doi\":\"10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosafety and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"49 1-2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosafety and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosafety and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS
microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.