《版权法》下数据库生产者权利侵权问题研究——以韩国大法院为中心,《2022年5月12日判决》,2021Do1533 -

hyun-wook jung
{"title":"《版权法》下数据库生产者权利侵权问题研究——以韩国大法院为中心,《2022年5月12日判决》,2021Do1533 -","authors":"hyun-wook jung","doi":"10.30582/kdps.2022.35.3.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering that excessive protection of the database may lead to a reduction in database use or restrictions on information exchange, which in turn may hinder the development of science and technology based on sharing information, it is necessary to interpret the current copyright law that protects the database by granting exclusive rights so as not to cause excessive restrictions on the distribution and use of information. \nSimilar concerns have been raised about the issue of information monopoly in the same way as for the EU Database directive which protects databases in a similar way to ours, and the European Court of Justice tries to reduce this risk by narrowly interpreting the scope of the rights of database producers in the British Horseracing Board judgement. \nThe materials of the database can be protected by misappropriation clause of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act. \nAnd the fact that the recent revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act has added illegal data acquisition to unfair competition is also a change in the environment to be considered in protecting the rights of database producers. \nRecently, Supreme Court of Korea Decision of 12 May 2022 2021Do1533 has ruled on whether data collection by data crawling constitutes a violation of the rights of database producers according to Copyright Law Article 93. In this judgment, the Supreme Court presented a clear standard of judgment regarding ‘a substantial part of the contents of Database’ and ‘repeated and systematic coping’ which are the requirements for infringement of the rights of database producers, taking into account the above concerns and changes in the environment.","PeriodicalId":350441,"journal":{"name":"Korea Copyright Commission","volume":"99 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Infringement of the Right of Database Producers under the Copyright Act - Focusing Supreme Court of Korea, Decision of 12 May 2022, 2021Do1533 -\",\"authors\":\"hyun-wook jung\",\"doi\":\"10.30582/kdps.2022.35.3.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considering that excessive protection of the database may lead to a reduction in database use or restrictions on information exchange, which in turn may hinder the development of science and technology based on sharing information, it is necessary to interpret the current copyright law that protects the database by granting exclusive rights so as not to cause excessive restrictions on the distribution and use of information. \\nSimilar concerns have been raised about the issue of information monopoly in the same way as for the EU Database directive which protects databases in a similar way to ours, and the European Court of Justice tries to reduce this risk by narrowly interpreting the scope of the rights of database producers in the British Horseracing Board judgement. \\nThe materials of the database can be protected by misappropriation clause of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act. \\nAnd the fact that the recent revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act has added illegal data acquisition to unfair competition is also a change in the environment to be considered in protecting the rights of database producers. \\nRecently, Supreme Court of Korea Decision of 12 May 2022 2021Do1533 has ruled on whether data collection by data crawling constitutes a violation of the rights of database producers according to Copyright Law Article 93. In this judgment, the Supreme Court presented a clear standard of judgment regarding ‘a substantial part of the contents of Database’ and ‘repeated and systematic coping’ which are the requirements for infringement of the rights of database producers, taking into account the above concerns and changes in the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"volume\":\"99 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2022.35.3.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Copyright Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2022.35.3.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到对数据库的过度保护可能导致数据库使用的减少或对信息交流的限制,从而阻碍以信息共享为基础的科学技术的发展,有必要对现行著作权法以授予专有权的方式保护数据库进行解释,以免对信息的传播和使用造成过度限制。关于信息垄断的问题,也有人提出了类似的担忧,就像欧盟数据库指令以与我们类似的方式保护数据库一样,欧洲法院试图通过在英国赛马委员会的判决中狭隘地解释数据库生产者的权利范围来减少这种风险。该数据库的资料可以受到《反不正当竞争法》的侵占条款的保护。而最近修订的《不正当竞争防制法》在不正当竞争的基础上又增加了非法获取数据的内容,这也是保护数据库生产者权利需要考虑的环境变化。最近,大法院根据《著作权法》第93条,对“数据爬行收集”是否构成侵犯数据库生产者权利的行为做出了判决。在此次判决中,考虑到上述问题和环境的变化,大法院对侵犯数据库生产者权利的要求“数据库内容的实质性部分”和“重复和系统的应对”提出了明确的判断标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Infringement of the Right of Database Producers under the Copyright Act - Focusing Supreme Court of Korea, Decision of 12 May 2022, 2021Do1533 -
Considering that excessive protection of the database may lead to a reduction in database use or restrictions on information exchange, which in turn may hinder the development of science and technology based on sharing information, it is necessary to interpret the current copyright law that protects the database by granting exclusive rights so as not to cause excessive restrictions on the distribution and use of information. Similar concerns have been raised about the issue of information monopoly in the same way as for the EU Database directive which protects databases in a similar way to ours, and the European Court of Justice tries to reduce this risk by narrowly interpreting the scope of the rights of database producers in the British Horseracing Board judgement. The materials of the database can be protected by misappropriation clause of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act. And the fact that the recent revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act has added illegal data acquisition to unfair competition is also a change in the environment to be considered in protecting the rights of database producers. Recently, Supreme Court of Korea Decision of 12 May 2022 2021Do1533 has ruled on whether data collection by data crawling constitutes a violation of the rights of database producers according to Copyright Law Article 93. In this judgment, the Supreme Court presented a clear standard of judgment regarding ‘a substantial part of the contents of Database’ and ‘repeated and systematic coping’ which are the requirements for infringement of the rights of database producers, taking into account the above concerns and changes in the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信