开发人员和工具如何在堆栈溢出问题中对情绪进行分类-一项试点研究

Niloofar Mansoor, Cole S. Peterson, Bonita Sharif
{"title":"开发人员和工具如何在堆栈溢出问题中对情绪进行分类-一项试点研究","authors":"Niloofar Mansoor, Cole S. Peterson, Bonita Sharif","doi":"10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents results from a pilot questionnaire-based study on ten Stack Overflow (SO) questions. Eleven developers were tasked with determining if the SO question sentiment was positive, negative or neutral. The results from the questionnaire indicate that developers mostly rated the sentiment of SO questions as neutral, stating that they received little or no emotional feedback from the questions. Tools that were designed to analyze Software Engineering related texts (SentiStrength-SE, SentiCR, and Senti4SD) were on average more closely aligned with developer ratings for a majority of the questions than general purpose tools for detecting SO question sentiment. We discuss cases where tools and developer sentiment differ along with implications of the results. Overall, the sentiment tool output on the question title and body is more aligned with the developer rating than just the title alone. Since SO is a very common medium of technical exchange, we also report that adding code snippets, short titles, and multiple tags were top three features developers prefer in SO questions in order for it to be answered quickly.","PeriodicalId":432937,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Developers and Tools Categorize Sentiment in Stack Overflow Questions - A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Niloofar Mansoor, Cole S. Peterson, Bonita Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents results from a pilot questionnaire-based study on ten Stack Overflow (SO) questions. Eleven developers were tasked with determining if the SO question sentiment was positive, negative or neutral. The results from the questionnaire indicate that developers mostly rated the sentiment of SO questions as neutral, stating that they received little or no emotional feedback from the questions. Tools that were designed to analyze Software Engineering related texts (SentiStrength-SE, SentiCR, and Senti4SD) were on average more closely aligned with developer ratings for a majority of the questions than general purpose tools for detecting SO question sentiment. We discuss cases where tools and developer sentiment differ along with implications of the results. Overall, the sentiment tool output on the question title and body is more aligned with the developer rating than just the title alone. Since SO is a very common medium of technical exchange, we also report that adding code snippets, short titles, and multiple tags were top three features developers prefer in SO questions in order for it to be answered quickly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了基于问卷调查的十个堆栈溢出(SO)问题的试点研究结果。11名开发者的任务是确定SO问题的情绪是积极的、消极的还是中性的。问卷调查的结果表明,开发者大多将SO问题的情绪评价为中性,即他们从问题中获得很少或没有情感反馈。设计用于分析软件工程相关文本的工具(SentiStrength-SE、SentiCR和Senti4SD)在大多数问题上平均比用于检测SO问题情绪的通用工具更接近开发人员评级。我们讨论了工具和开发人员的观点不同的情况,以及结果的含义。总的来说,情感工具在问题标题和正文上的输出更符合开发者的评级,而不仅仅是标题。由于SO是一种非常常见的技术交流媒介,我们还报告说,添加代码片段、简短标题和多个标签是开发人员在SO问题中最喜欢的三个特性,以便快速回答问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Developers and Tools Categorize Sentiment in Stack Overflow Questions - A Pilot Study
The paper presents results from a pilot questionnaire-based study on ten Stack Overflow (SO) questions. Eleven developers were tasked with determining if the SO question sentiment was positive, negative or neutral. The results from the questionnaire indicate that developers mostly rated the sentiment of SO questions as neutral, stating that they received little or no emotional feedback from the questions. Tools that were designed to analyze Software Engineering related texts (SentiStrength-SE, SentiCR, and Senti4SD) were on average more closely aligned with developer ratings for a majority of the questions than general purpose tools for detecting SO question sentiment. We discuss cases where tools and developer sentiment differ along with implications of the results. Overall, the sentiment tool output on the question title and body is more aligned with the developer rating than just the title alone. Since SO is a very common medium of technical exchange, we also report that adding code snippets, short titles, and multiple tags were top three features developers prefer in SO questions in order for it to be answered quickly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信