Yimai Peng, K. Choo, Sechang Oh, Inhee Lee, Taekwang Jang, Yejoong Kim, Jongyup Lim, D. Blaauw, D. Sylvester
{"title":"27.2具有541%能量提取增益的压电采集中改进的最大功率点跟踪的绝热感应和整流器","authors":"Yimai Peng, K. Choo, Sechang Oh, Inhee Lee, Taekwang Jang, Yejoong Kim, Jongyup Lim, D. Blaauw, D. Sylvester","doi":"10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) convert mechanical energy from vibrations into electrical energy. They have become popular in energy-autonomous IoT systems. However.’ the total energy extracted by a PEH is highly sensitive to matching between the PEH impedance and the energy extraction circuit. Prior solutions include the use of a full-bridge rectifier (FBR) and a so-called synchronous electric-charge extraction (SECE) [1], and are suitable for non-periodic vibrations. However, their extraction efficiency is low since the large internal capacitance $C_{\\mathrm {p}}$ (usually 10’s of nF) of the PEH (Fig. 27.2.1) prevents the output voltage from reaching its maximum power point (MPP) under a typical sinusoidal and transient excitation $(V_{\\mathrm {M}\\mathrm {P}\\mathrm {P}}={1/2}\\cdot l_{\\mathrm {p}}R_{\\mathrm {p}})$. A recently proposed technique [2], [3], [4], called bias-flip, achieves a higher extraction efficiency by forcing a predetermined constant voltage at the PEH output, $V_{\\mathrm {p}}$, which is then flipped every half-period of the assumed sinusoidal excitation (Fig. 27.2.1, top left). To flip $V_{\\mathrm {p}},$ the energy in capacitor $C_{\\mathrm {p}}$ is extracted using either a large external inductor [2], [3] or capacitor arrays [4]. It is then restored with the opposite polarity (Fig. 27.2.1, top). However, $V_{\\mathrm {M}\\mathrm {P}\\mathrm {P}}$ of the PEH varies with sinusoidal current /.’ hence, the two fixed values of $V_{\\mathrm {p}}$ in the flip-bias technique either over-or underestimate $V_{\\mathrm {M}\\mathrm {P}\\mathrm {P}}$ for much of the oscillation cycle (pattern filled regions in Fig. 27.2.1, top right). In addition, none of the prior approaches compensate for $V_{\\mathrm {M}\\mathrm {P}\\mathrm {P}}$-waveform amplitude changes, due to input intensity variations or decaying oscillations after an impulse, further degrading efficiency.","PeriodicalId":265551,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)","volume":"11 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"27.2 An Adiabatic Sense and Set Rectifier for Improved Maximum-Power-Point Tracking in Piezoelectric Harvesting with 541% Energy Extraction Gain\",\"authors\":\"Yimai Peng, K. Choo, Sechang Oh, Inhee Lee, Taekwang Jang, Yejoong Kim, Jongyup Lim, D. Blaauw, D. Sylvester\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) convert mechanical energy from vibrations into electrical energy. They have become popular in energy-autonomous IoT systems. However.’ the total energy extracted by a PEH is highly sensitive to matching between the PEH impedance and the energy extraction circuit. Prior solutions include the use of a full-bridge rectifier (FBR) and a so-called synchronous electric-charge extraction (SECE) [1], and are suitable for non-periodic vibrations. However, their extraction efficiency is low since the large internal capacitance $C_{\\\\mathrm {p}}$ (usually 10’s of nF) of the PEH (Fig. 27.2.1) prevents the output voltage from reaching its maximum power point (MPP) under a typical sinusoidal and transient excitation $(V_{\\\\mathrm {M}\\\\mathrm {P}\\\\mathrm {P}}={1/2}\\\\cdot l_{\\\\mathrm {p}}R_{\\\\mathrm {p}})$. A recently proposed technique [2], [3], [4], called bias-flip, achieves a higher extraction efficiency by forcing a predetermined constant voltage at the PEH output, $V_{\\\\mathrm {p}}$, which is then flipped every half-period of the assumed sinusoidal excitation (Fig. 27.2.1, top left). To flip $V_{\\\\mathrm {p}},$ the energy in capacitor $C_{\\\\mathrm {p}}$ is extracted using either a large external inductor [2], [3] or capacitor arrays [4]. It is then restored with the opposite polarity (Fig. 27.2.1, top). However, $V_{\\\\mathrm {M}\\\\mathrm {P}\\\\mathrm {P}}$ of the PEH varies with sinusoidal current /.’ hence, the two fixed values of $V_{\\\\mathrm {p}}$ in the flip-bias technique either over-or underestimate $V_{\\\\mathrm {M}\\\\mathrm {P}\\\\mathrm {P}}$ for much of the oscillation cycle (pattern filled regions in Fig. 27.2.1, top right). In addition, none of the prior approaches compensate for $V_{\\\\mathrm {M}\\\\mathrm {P}\\\\mathrm {P}}$-waveform amplitude changes, due to input intensity variations or decaying oscillations after an impulse, further degrading efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
27.2 An Adiabatic Sense and Set Rectifier for Improved Maximum-Power-Point Tracking in Piezoelectric Harvesting with 541% Energy Extraction Gain
Piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) convert mechanical energy from vibrations into electrical energy. They have become popular in energy-autonomous IoT systems. However.’ the total energy extracted by a PEH is highly sensitive to matching between the PEH impedance and the energy extraction circuit. Prior solutions include the use of a full-bridge rectifier (FBR) and a so-called synchronous electric-charge extraction (SECE) [1], and are suitable for non-periodic vibrations. However, their extraction efficiency is low since the large internal capacitance $C_{\mathrm {p}}$ (usually 10’s of nF) of the PEH (Fig. 27.2.1) prevents the output voltage from reaching its maximum power point (MPP) under a typical sinusoidal and transient excitation $(V_{\mathrm {M}\mathrm {P}\mathrm {P}}={1/2}\cdot l_{\mathrm {p}}R_{\mathrm {p}})$. A recently proposed technique [2], [3], [4], called bias-flip, achieves a higher extraction efficiency by forcing a predetermined constant voltage at the PEH output, $V_{\mathrm {p}}$, which is then flipped every half-period of the assumed sinusoidal excitation (Fig. 27.2.1, top left). To flip $V_{\mathrm {p}},$ the energy in capacitor $C_{\mathrm {p}}$ is extracted using either a large external inductor [2], [3] or capacitor arrays [4]. It is then restored with the opposite polarity (Fig. 27.2.1, top). However, $V_{\mathrm {M}\mathrm {P}\mathrm {P}}$ of the PEH varies with sinusoidal current /.’ hence, the two fixed values of $V_{\mathrm {p}}$ in the flip-bias technique either over-or underestimate $V_{\mathrm {M}\mathrm {P}\mathrm {P}}$ for much of the oscillation cycle (pattern filled regions in Fig. 27.2.1, top right). In addition, none of the prior approaches compensate for $V_{\mathrm {M}\mathrm {P}\mathrm {P}}$-waveform amplitude changes, due to input intensity variations or decaying oscillations after an impulse, further degrading efficiency.