云平台下KVM、Docker和Unikernels的时间分配评估

Bruno Xavier, T. Ferreto, L. C. Jersak
{"title":"云平台下KVM、Docker和Unikernels的时间分配评估","authors":"Bruno Xavier, T. Ferreto, L. C. Jersak","doi":"10.1109/CCGrid.2016.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unikernels are a promising alternative for application deployment in cloud platforms. They comprise a very small footprint, providing better deployment agility and portability among virtualization platforms. Similar to Linux containers, they are a lightweight alternative for deploying distributed applications based on microservices. However, the comparison of unikernels with other virtualization options regarding the concurrent provisioning of instances, as in the case of microservices-based applications, is still lacking. This paper provides an evaluation of KVM (Virtual Machines), Docker (Containers), and OSv (Unikernel), when provisioning multiple instances concurrently in an OpenStack cloud platform. We confirmed that OSv outperforms the other options and also identified opportunities for optimization.","PeriodicalId":103641,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)","volume":"15 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Provisioning Evaluation of KVM, Docker and Unikernels in a Cloud Platform\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Xavier, T. Ferreto, L. C. Jersak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCGrid.2016.86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unikernels are a promising alternative for application deployment in cloud platforms. They comprise a very small footprint, providing better deployment agility and portability among virtualization platforms. Similar to Linux containers, they are a lightweight alternative for deploying distributed applications based on microservices. However, the comparison of unikernels with other virtualization options regarding the concurrent provisioning of instances, as in the case of microservices-based applications, is still lacking. This paper provides an evaluation of KVM (Virtual Machines), Docker (Containers), and OSv (Unikernel), when provisioning multiple instances concurrently in an OpenStack cloud platform. We confirmed that OSv outperforms the other options and also identified opportunities for optimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

Unikernels是云平台中应用程序部署的一个很有前途的替代方案。它们占用的空间非常小,在虚拟化平台之间提供了更好的部署灵活性和可移植性。与Linux容器类似,它们是部署基于微服务的分布式应用程序的轻量级替代方案。然而,在基于微服务的应用程序的情况下,unikernels与其他虚拟化选项在实例并发供应方面的比较仍然缺乏。本文对在OpenStack云平台上并发发放多个实例时,KVM (Virtual Machines)、Docker (Containers)和OSv (Unikernel)进行了评估。我们确认OSv优于其他选项,并确定了优化的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time Provisioning Evaluation of KVM, Docker and Unikernels in a Cloud Platform
Unikernels are a promising alternative for application deployment in cloud platforms. They comprise a very small footprint, providing better deployment agility and portability among virtualization platforms. Similar to Linux containers, they are a lightweight alternative for deploying distributed applications based on microservices. However, the comparison of unikernels with other virtualization options regarding the concurrent provisioning of instances, as in the case of microservices-based applications, is still lacking. This paper provides an evaluation of KVM (Virtual Machines), Docker (Containers), and OSv (Unikernel), when provisioning multiple instances concurrently in an OpenStack cloud platform. We confirmed that OSv outperforms the other options and also identified opportunities for optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信