公司治理、保守主义与审计师辞职

Jiahui Liang, Changhong Lyu
{"title":"公司治理、保守主义与审计师辞职","authors":"Jiahui Liang, Changhong Lyu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2951607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the influence of conditional conservatism on the auditor resignations, and more importantly, the impact of corporate governance on this relationship. The existing literature has provided evidence on the existence and pervasiveness of accounting conservatism, such as compensation and debt contracts, shareholder litigation, taxation and accounting supervision. However, there is very limited evidence and discussion on the potential impact of accounting conservatism on audit risk and auditor resignation. Furthermore, research on how effective corporate governance affects the relationship is rarely covered. \nWe select the firm-year observations from 2005 to 2015. We find that the conditional conservatism reduces the auditor resignations by reducing the expected audit risk. However, further empirical results show that this reduction in auditor resignations is attenuated by higher corporate governance quality. That is, effective corporate governance will moderate the negative correlation between conservatism and auditor resignations. The empirical results of this paper are of value to firms, auditors, regulators, standard-setters and corporate managers. In addition, this paper expands the literature on the influencing factors of auditor resignations.","PeriodicalId":113347,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth ARC: Financial Accounting (Topic)","volume":"20 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Governance, Conservatism and Auditor Resignation\",\"authors\":\"Jiahui Liang, Changhong Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2951607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the influence of conditional conservatism on the auditor resignations, and more importantly, the impact of corporate governance on this relationship. The existing literature has provided evidence on the existence and pervasiveness of accounting conservatism, such as compensation and debt contracts, shareholder litigation, taxation and accounting supervision. However, there is very limited evidence and discussion on the potential impact of accounting conservatism on audit risk and auditor resignation. Furthermore, research on how effective corporate governance affects the relationship is rarely covered. \\nWe select the firm-year observations from 2005 to 2015. We find that the conditional conservatism reduces the auditor resignations by reducing the expected audit risk. However, further empirical results show that this reduction in auditor resignations is attenuated by higher corporate governance quality. That is, effective corporate governance will moderate the negative correlation between conservatism and auditor resignations. The empirical results of this paper are of value to firms, auditors, regulators, standard-setters and corporate managers. In addition, this paper expands the literature on the influencing factors of auditor resignations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicago Booth ARC: Financial Accounting (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicago Booth ARC: Financial Accounting (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth ARC: Financial Accounting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了条件保守主义对审计师辞职的影响,更重要的是研究了公司治理对这种关系的影响。现有文献从补偿与债务合同、股东诉讼、税收与会计监管等方面提供了会计稳健性存在和普遍存在的证据。然而,关于会计稳健性对审计风险和审计师辞职的潜在影响的证据和讨论非常有限。此外,关于有效的公司治理如何影响这种关系的研究也很少被报道。我们选择2005 - 2015年的公司年观测值。研究发现,条件保守性是通过降低预期审计风险来减少审计师辞职的。然而,进一步的实证结果表明,更高的公司治理质量减弱了审计师辞职的减少。也就是说,有效的公司治理会调节保守性与审计师辞职之间的负相关关系。本文的实证结果对企业、审计人员、监管机构、准则制定者和企业管理者具有一定的参考价值。此外,本文还对有关审计师辞职影响因素的文献进行了扩充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Governance, Conservatism and Auditor Resignation
This paper studies the influence of conditional conservatism on the auditor resignations, and more importantly, the impact of corporate governance on this relationship. The existing literature has provided evidence on the existence and pervasiveness of accounting conservatism, such as compensation and debt contracts, shareholder litigation, taxation and accounting supervision. However, there is very limited evidence and discussion on the potential impact of accounting conservatism on audit risk and auditor resignation. Furthermore, research on how effective corporate governance affects the relationship is rarely covered. We select the firm-year observations from 2005 to 2015. We find that the conditional conservatism reduces the auditor resignations by reducing the expected audit risk. However, further empirical results show that this reduction in auditor resignations is attenuated by higher corporate governance quality. That is, effective corporate governance will moderate the negative correlation between conservatism and auditor resignations. The empirical results of this paper are of value to firms, auditors, regulators, standard-setters and corporate managers. In addition, this paper expands the literature on the influencing factors of auditor resignations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信