企业公民:在理想与实践之间

Bouguila Sihem
{"title":"企业公民:在理想与实践之间","authors":"Bouguila Sihem","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2176758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to check if sustainable social status is an explanatory framework or a constraint for development of sustainable opportunistic strategies. In particular, Our ambition in this paper is to point out the contradictions that exist between the concerns shown by the team leaders in their speeches and their really practices in this field. We would thus be able to critically assess the convergent illusory between theoretical concerns and managerial speeches. Based on a specific sample, which is sustainable citizen companies along the period 2002-2007, we examine through a qualitative study, six social reports of “sustainable citizen firms”. Our analysis show a repetitive vocabulary used in all of these speeches thereby as to be a fad and social marketing. More worthy it seems that the social evaluation may be not honest and the worst that it is questionable as it may be biased by the content of social report and opportunistic strategies behind.","PeriodicalId":245576,"journal":{"name":"CSR & Management Practice eJournal","volume":"44 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Citizenship: Between Utopia and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Bouguila Sihem\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2176758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to check if sustainable social status is an explanatory framework or a constraint for development of sustainable opportunistic strategies. In particular, Our ambition in this paper is to point out the contradictions that exist between the concerns shown by the team leaders in their speeches and their really practices in this field. We would thus be able to critically assess the convergent illusory between theoretical concerns and managerial speeches. Based on a specific sample, which is sustainable citizen companies along the period 2002-2007, we examine through a qualitative study, six social reports of “sustainable citizen firms”. Our analysis show a repetitive vocabulary used in all of these speeches thereby as to be a fad and social marketing. More worthy it seems that the social evaluation may be not honest and the worst that it is questionable as it may be biased by the content of social report and opportunistic strategies behind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CSR & Management Practice eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CSR & Management Practice eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2176758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSR & Management Practice eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2176758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检验可持续社会地位是可持续机会主义战略发展的解释框架还是制约因素。特别是,我们在本文中的目标是指出团队领导在演讲中所表现出的关注与他们在该领域的实际实践之间存在的矛盾。因此,我们将能够批判性地评估理论关注和管理演讲之间的趋同幻觉。本文以2002-2007年的可持续公民企业为样本,通过定性研究的方法,考察了6份“可持续公民企业”的社会报告。我们的分析表明,在所有这些演讲中使用的重复词汇,从而成为一种时尚和社会营销。更值得注意的是,社会评价可能不诚实,最糟糕的是,它可能因社会报道的内容和背后的机会主义策略而受到偏见,令人怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Citizenship: Between Utopia and Practice
The objective of this research is to check if sustainable social status is an explanatory framework or a constraint for development of sustainable opportunistic strategies. In particular, Our ambition in this paper is to point out the contradictions that exist between the concerns shown by the team leaders in their speeches and their really practices in this field. We would thus be able to critically assess the convergent illusory between theoretical concerns and managerial speeches. Based on a specific sample, which is sustainable citizen companies along the period 2002-2007, we examine through a qualitative study, six social reports of “sustainable citizen firms”. Our analysis show a repetitive vocabulary used in all of these speeches thereby as to be a fad and social marketing. More worthy it seems that the social evaluation may be not honest and the worst that it is questionable as it may be biased by the content of social report and opportunistic strategies behind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信