表面活性剂-聚合物驱:科威特砂岩油藏单井化学示踪剂测试设计与实施

Mohammed T. Al Murayri, A. Hassan, A. Rahim, B. Decroux, A. Negre, M. Salaun
{"title":"表面活性剂-聚合物驱:科威特砂岩油藏单井化学示踪剂测试设计与实施","authors":"Mohammed T. Al Murayri, A. Hassan, A. Rahim, B. Decroux, A. Negre, M. Salaun","doi":"10.2118/197995-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses the design and implementation of a Single Well Chemical Tracer Test (SWCTT) to evaluate the efficacy of a lab-optimized surfactant-polymer formulation for the Raudhatain Lower Burgan (RALB) reservoir in North Kuwait.\n A SWCTT was designed upon completing extensive lab and simulation work as discussed in a previous publication (Al-Murayri et al. 2017 and Al-Murayri et al. 2018). SWCTT design work was aimed at confirming the optimal injection/production sequence determined at core flood scale in terms of minimal volumes, rates and duration. The main uncertainties were assessed using numerous sensitivity scenarios. Afterwards, the SWCTT was implemented in the field and the results were carefully analyzed and compared to previously obtained lab andsimulation results.\n The main objective of this SWCTT was to validate the efficacy of polymer and surfactant solutions in terms of residual oil saturation reduction and injectivity. This invovles comparing residual oil saturation estimates before and after chemical flooding while monitoring injection rates and corresponding wellhead pressures. The SWCTT injection sequence included the following steps:Initial water-flooding, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post water flooding.Pre-flush followed by a main-slug (with 5,000 ppm of surfactant and 500 ppm of polymer) and a post-flush (with only polymer).Sea-water push, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post chemical flooding.\n Simulation work prior to the execution of the SWCTT test showed encouraging oil desaturation results post chemical flooding within a distance of 10 ft from the well. However, upon analyzing the pilot results, it was realized that there is a gap between the actual SWCTT results and previously obtained lab andsimulation results. This paper sheds light on the design and implementation of the above-mentioned SWCTTwith emphasis on the potential reasons for the realized gap between actual field data and lab/simulation results. The insights from this study are expected to assist in further optimization of surfactant-polymer flooding to economically increase oil recovery from relatively mature reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":282370,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019","volume":"39 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surfactant-Polymer Flooding: Single Well Chemical Tracer Test Design and Implementation in a Major Sandstone Kuwaiti Reservoir\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed T. Al Murayri, A. Hassan, A. Rahim, B. Decroux, A. Negre, M. Salaun\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197995-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper discusses the design and implementation of a Single Well Chemical Tracer Test (SWCTT) to evaluate the efficacy of a lab-optimized surfactant-polymer formulation for the Raudhatain Lower Burgan (RALB) reservoir in North Kuwait.\\n A SWCTT was designed upon completing extensive lab and simulation work as discussed in a previous publication (Al-Murayri et al. 2017 and Al-Murayri et al. 2018). SWCTT design work was aimed at confirming the optimal injection/production sequence determined at core flood scale in terms of minimal volumes, rates and duration. The main uncertainties were assessed using numerous sensitivity scenarios. Afterwards, the SWCTT was implemented in the field and the results were carefully analyzed and compared to previously obtained lab andsimulation results.\\n The main objective of this SWCTT was to validate the efficacy of polymer and surfactant solutions in terms of residual oil saturation reduction and injectivity. This invovles comparing residual oil saturation estimates before and after chemical flooding while monitoring injection rates and corresponding wellhead pressures. The SWCTT injection sequence included the following steps:Initial water-flooding, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post water flooding.Pre-flush followed by a main-slug (with 5,000 ppm of surfactant and 500 ppm of polymer) and a post-flush (with only polymer).Sea-water push, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post chemical flooding.\\n Simulation work prior to the execution of the SWCTT test showed encouraging oil desaturation results post chemical flooding within a distance of 10 ft from the well. However, upon analyzing the pilot results, it was realized that there is a gap between the actual SWCTT results and previously obtained lab andsimulation results. This paper sheds light on the design and implementation of the above-mentioned SWCTTwith emphasis on the potential reasons for the realized gap between actual field data and lab/simulation results. The insights from this study are expected to assist in further optimization of surfactant-polymer flooding to economically increase oil recovery from relatively mature reservoirs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197995-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, October 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197995-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了科威特北部Raudhatain Lower Burgan (RALB)油藏单井化学示踪剂测试(SWCTT)的设计和实施,以评估实验室优化的表面活性剂-聚合物配方的效果。SWCTT是在完成先前出版物(al - murayri et al. 2017和al - murayri et al. 2018)中讨论的广泛的实验室和模拟工作后设计的。SWCTT的设计工作旨在确定在岩心洪水规模下,根据最小体积、速率和持续时间确定的最佳注入/生产顺序。主要的不确定性是用许多敏感性情景来评估的。随后,SWCTT在现场实施,并对结果进行了仔细分析,并与之前获得的实验室和模拟结果进行了比较。SWCTT的主要目的是验证聚合物和表面活性剂溶液在降低残余油饱和度和注入能力方面的有效性。这包括比较化学驱前后的残余油饱和度估算值,同时监测注入速率和相应的井口压力。SWCTT注入顺序包括以下步骤:初始水驱,然后注入示踪剂,浸泡和生产,以测量水驱后的含油饱和度。预冲之后是主段塞(加入5000 ppm的表面活性剂和500 ppm的聚合物)和后冲(只加入聚合物)。化学驱后进行海水推注、示踪剂注入、浸泡和生产,测量含油饱和度。在SWCTT测试之前的模拟工作显示,在距井10英尺的范围内,化学驱后的原油去饱和效果令人鼓舞。然而,在分析试点结果后,人们意识到实际SWCTT结果与先前获得的实验室和模拟结果之间存在差距。本文阐述了上述swctt的设计和实现,重点讨论了实际现场数据与实验室/模拟结果之间存在差距的潜在原因。该研究的见解有望帮助进一步优化表面活性剂-聚合物驱,以经济地提高相对成熟油藏的采收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surfactant-Polymer Flooding: Single Well Chemical Tracer Test Design and Implementation in a Major Sandstone Kuwaiti Reservoir
This paper discusses the design and implementation of a Single Well Chemical Tracer Test (SWCTT) to evaluate the efficacy of a lab-optimized surfactant-polymer formulation for the Raudhatain Lower Burgan (RALB) reservoir in North Kuwait. A SWCTT was designed upon completing extensive lab and simulation work as discussed in a previous publication (Al-Murayri et al. 2017 and Al-Murayri et al. 2018). SWCTT design work was aimed at confirming the optimal injection/production sequence determined at core flood scale in terms of minimal volumes, rates and duration. The main uncertainties were assessed using numerous sensitivity scenarios. Afterwards, the SWCTT was implemented in the field and the results were carefully analyzed and compared to previously obtained lab andsimulation results. The main objective of this SWCTT was to validate the efficacy of polymer and surfactant solutions in terms of residual oil saturation reduction and injectivity. This invovles comparing residual oil saturation estimates before and after chemical flooding while monitoring injection rates and corresponding wellhead pressures. The SWCTT injection sequence included the following steps:Initial water-flooding, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post water flooding.Pre-flush followed by a main-slug (with 5,000 ppm of surfactant and 500 ppm of polymer) and a post-flush (with only polymer).Sea-water push, followed by tracer injection, soaking and production to measure oil saturation post chemical flooding. Simulation work prior to the execution of the SWCTT test showed encouraging oil desaturation results post chemical flooding within a distance of 10 ft from the well. However, upon analyzing the pilot results, it was realized that there is a gap between the actual SWCTT results and previously obtained lab andsimulation results. This paper sheds light on the design and implementation of the above-mentioned SWCTTwith emphasis on the potential reasons for the realized gap between actual field data and lab/simulation results. The insights from this study are expected to assist in further optimization of surfactant-polymer flooding to economically increase oil recovery from relatively mature reservoirs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信