伦理考虑困境:通过访谈对定性数据收集中的伦理进行系统回顾

Michael Nii Laryeafio, Omoruyi Courage Ogbewe
{"title":"伦理考虑困境:通过访谈对定性数据收集中的伦理进行系统回顾","authors":"Michael Nii Laryeafio, Omoruyi Courage Ogbewe","doi":"10.1108/jeet-09-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nQualitative research that involves the use of human participants calls for the need to protect those participants to give their honest view during data collection. This is an important part of every primary data collection in qualitative studies using interviews. This paper aims to investigate all available ethical considerations that need to be observed by the researcher when conducting primary data collection through interview and to explore the theories that underpin the ethics in qualitative studies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper systemically reviewed existing qualitative data on ethics and gathered information that were analysed and presented on the topic area.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings show that ethical considerations deal with the various approaches adopted by the researcher to make the participants feel safe to participate in any given researcher. During an interview process in qualitative research, the findings show that anonymity, voluntary participation, privacy, confidentiality, option to opt out and avoiding misuse of findings are ethical considerations that must be observed by the researcher. The outcome of the investigation also shows that deontology and utilitarianism, rights and virtue are the main theories that underpin ethical considerations in research.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe rights of the research participants need to be respected in qualitative research to assist in gathering accurate information to achieve the objectives of study. This and other ethical principles such as anonymity, privacy, confidentiality, voluntary participation and option to opt out guide the researcher to systematically adhere to data collection approaches that yield valid results in qualitative data collection using interviews.\n","PeriodicalId":229407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology","volume":"5 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical consideration dilemma: systematic review of ethics in qualitative data collection through interviews\",\"authors\":\"Michael Nii Laryeafio, Omoruyi Courage Ogbewe\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jeet-09-2022-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nQualitative research that involves the use of human participants calls for the need to protect those participants to give their honest view during data collection. This is an important part of every primary data collection in qualitative studies using interviews. This paper aims to investigate all available ethical considerations that need to be observed by the researcher when conducting primary data collection through interview and to explore the theories that underpin the ethics in qualitative studies.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper systemically reviewed existing qualitative data on ethics and gathered information that were analysed and presented on the topic area.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings show that ethical considerations deal with the various approaches adopted by the researcher to make the participants feel safe to participate in any given researcher. During an interview process in qualitative research, the findings show that anonymity, voluntary participation, privacy, confidentiality, option to opt out and avoiding misuse of findings are ethical considerations that must be observed by the researcher. The outcome of the investigation also shows that deontology and utilitarianism, rights and virtue are the main theories that underpin ethical considerations in research.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe rights of the research participants need to be respected in qualitative research to assist in gathering accurate information to achieve the objectives of study. This and other ethical principles such as anonymity, privacy, confidentiality, voluntary participation and option to opt out guide the researcher to systematically adhere to data collection approaches that yield valid results in qualitative data collection using interviews.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":229407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-09-2022-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-09-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的涉及使用人类参与者的定量研究要求在数据收集过程中需要保护这些参与者提供诚实的观点。这是使用访谈进行定性研究的每个主要数据收集的重要组成部分。本文的目的是调查所有可用的伦理考虑,需要由研究人员通过访谈进行主要数据收集时观察到的,并探讨在定性研究中支撑伦理的理论。设计/方法/方法本文系统地回顾了现有的关于伦理学的定性数据,并收集了关于该主题领域的分析和呈现的信息。研究结果表明,伦理考虑涉及研究人员采用的各种方法,以使参与者感到安全参与任何给定的研究。在定性研究的访谈过程中,研究结果表明,匿名、自愿参与、隐私、保密、选择退出和避免滥用研究结果是研究者必须遵守的道德考虑因素。调查结果还表明,义务论与功利主义、权利与美德是支撑研究伦理考虑的主要理论。原创性/价值在定性研究中需要尊重研究参与者的权利,以帮助收集准确的信息以实现研究目标。这和其他伦理原则,如匿名、隐私、保密、自愿参与和选择退出,指导研究人员系统地坚持数据收集方法,在使用访谈的定性数据收集中产生有效的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical consideration dilemma: systematic review of ethics in qualitative data collection through interviews
Purpose Qualitative research that involves the use of human participants calls for the need to protect those participants to give their honest view during data collection. This is an important part of every primary data collection in qualitative studies using interviews. This paper aims to investigate all available ethical considerations that need to be observed by the researcher when conducting primary data collection through interview and to explore the theories that underpin the ethics in qualitative studies. Design/methodology/approach This paper systemically reviewed existing qualitative data on ethics and gathered information that were analysed and presented on the topic area. Findings The findings show that ethical considerations deal with the various approaches adopted by the researcher to make the participants feel safe to participate in any given researcher. During an interview process in qualitative research, the findings show that anonymity, voluntary participation, privacy, confidentiality, option to opt out and avoiding misuse of findings are ethical considerations that must be observed by the researcher. The outcome of the investigation also shows that deontology and utilitarianism, rights and virtue are the main theories that underpin ethical considerations in research. Originality/value The rights of the research participants need to be respected in qualitative research to assist in gathering accurate information to achieve the objectives of study. This and other ethical principles such as anonymity, privacy, confidentiality, voluntary participation and option to opt out guide the researcher to systematically adhere to data collection approaches that yield valid results in qualitative data collection using interviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信