{"title":"提交给澳大利亚双边投资条约审查的文件","authors":"Elizabeth Sheargold, Markus Wagner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our submission is focussed on how Australia’s BITs can be modernised to ensure that the promotion and protection of investments is balanced against the need to safeguard policy space for legitimate public-welfare measures or ‘regulatory autonomy’. This discussion responds primarily to Question 4 of the questions for consideration outlined in the DFAT Discussion Paper, by providing our views on clauses that should be included in any renegotiated BITs or other investment agreements negotiated by Australia in the future.","PeriodicalId":130703,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Submission to the Review of Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Sheargold, Markus Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3725879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our submission is focussed on how Australia’s BITs can be modernised to ensure that the promotion and protection of investments is balanced against the need to safeguard policy space for legitimate public-welfare measures or ‘regulatory autonomy’. This discussion responds primarily to Question 4 of the questions for consideration outlined in the DFAT Discussion Paper, by providing our views on clauses that should be included in any renegotiated BITs or other investment agreements negotiated by Australia in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Submission to the Review of Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties
Our submission is focussed on how Australia’s BITs can be modernised to ensure that the promotion and protection of investments is balanced against the need to safeguard policy space for legitimate public-welfare measures or ‘regulatory autonomy’. This discussion responds primarily to Question 4 of the questions for consideration outlined in the DFAT Discussion Paper, by providing our views on clauses that should be included in any renegotiated BITs or other investment agreements negotiated by Australia in the future.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
