宪法法院证据数字化:机遇与必要

M. Fauzan, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
{"title":"宪法法院证据数字化:机遇与必要","authors":"M. Fauzan, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar","doi":"10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitization has spread to people's live, it is also necessary to reform the judiciary for the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence in procedural law. Legalization rather than the use of digitalized evidence is also needed for legal certainty in proceedings. The research method used in this study is a normative legal method with a historical approach and statutory approach. The historical approach is used to analyze the background of constitutional cases in the past and is connected to current conditions related to evidence. A statutory approach is needed to analyze the legality of using digital evidence when taking proceedings at the Constitutional Court. The results of this study are found that the history of constitutional cases that have relevance to the existence of the Constitutional Court is the background for the occurrence of evidence in the institution that guards the constitution. The use of digital evidence has proven necessary to realize the principle of fast, easy and cheap process. In addition, its practical use is only limited to the administrative affairs of the court clerks, not to the evidentiary process in the Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court. So that it is necessary to adapt the court to digitalization to get to the proof stage by carrying out legal formulations in the form of changes to the procedural law of the Constitutional Court which will provide space for evidence in digital form in proceedings at the Constitutional Court.","PeriodicalId":165691,"journal":{"name":"Veteran Law Review","volume":"879 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite\",\"authors\":\"M. Fauzan, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar\",\"doi\":\"10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitization has spread to people's live, it is also necessary to reform the judiciary for the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence in procedural law. Legalization rather than the use of digitalized evidence is also needed for legal certainty in proceedings. The research method used in this study is a normative legal method with a historical approach and statutory approach. The historical approach is used to analyze the background of constitutional cases in the past and is connected to current conditions related to evidence. A statutory approach is needed to analyze the legality of using digital evidence when taking proceedings at the Constitutional Court. The results of this study are found that the history of constitutional cases that have relevance to the existence of the Constitutional Court is the background for the occurrence of evidence in the institution that guards the constitution. The use of digital evidence has proven necessary to realize the principle of fast, easy and cheap process. In addition, its practical use is only limited to the administrative affairs of the court clerks, not to the evidentiary process in the Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court. So that it is necessary to adapt the court to digitalization to get to the proof stage by carrying out legal formulations in the form of changes to the procedural law of the Constitutional Court which will provide space for evidence in digital form in proceedings at the Constitutional Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veteran Law Review\",\"volume\":\"879 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veteran Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veteran Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化已经深入到人们的生活中,为了提高程序法证据的效率和有效性,司法改革也是必要的。为了确保诉讼程序中的法律确定性,还需要将数字化证据合法化,而不是使用数字化证据。本研究采用的研究方法是一种规范的法律方法,兼有历史方法和成文法方法。历史方法用于分析过去宪法案件的背景,并与证据相关的当前条件相联系。在宪法法院进行诉讼时,需要从法律角度分析使用数字证据的合法性。研究结果发现,与宪法法院存在相关的宪法案件的历史是宪法保护机构中证据发生的背景。事实证明,使用数字证据是实现快速、简便、廉价原则的必要条件。此外,它的实际使用仅限于法院书记员的行政事务,而不是宪法法院《诉讼法》中的证据程序。因此,有必要通过修改宪法法院诉讼法的形式进行法律制定,使法院适应数字化,从而进入证明阶段,从而为宪法法院诉讼中的数字化证据提供空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite
Digitization has spread to people's live, it is also necessary to reform the judiciary for the efficiency and effectiveness of evidence in procedural law. Legalization rather than the use of digitalized evidence is also needed for legal certainty in proceedings. The research method used in this study is a normative legal method with a historical approach and statutory approach. The historical approach is used to analyze the background of constitutional cases in the past and is connected to current conditions related to evidence. A statutory approach is needed to analyze the legality of using digital evidence when taking proceedings at the Constitutional Court. The results of this study are found that the history of constitutional cases that have relevance to the existence of the Constitutional Court is the background for the occurrence of evidence in the institution that guards the constitution. The use of digital evidence has proven necessary to realize the principle of fast, easy and cheap process. In addition, its practical use is only limited to the administrative affairs of the court clerks, not to the evidentiary process in the Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court. So that it is necessary to adapt the court to digitalization to get to the proof stage by carrying out legal formulations in the form of changes to the procedural law of the Constitutional Court which will provide space for evidence in digital form in proceedings at the Constitutional Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信