匿名与假名:哪一种对隐私保护和电子医疗数据的有用性都最有用

Rose Tinabo, F. Mtenzi, B. O'Shea
{"title":"匿名与假名:哪一种对隐私保护和电子医疗数据的有用性都最有用","authors":"Rose Tinabo, F. Mtenzi, B. O'Shea","doi":"10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to sensitivity nature of the data in e-healthcare and the need of these data to different “Healthcare Team”, privacy is one of the important issues to consider for its use. Without highly consideration of privacy issues, available data will not be useful. This results in introduction of different techniques that insist privacy protection. Anonymisation and Pseudonymisation are the main methods in privacy protection. Even though they both protect privacy, their usefulness may vary depending on the usage of the data, therefore users must be able to choose a technique to use. This paper compares characteristics of anonymisation and pseudonymisation techniques in e-healthcare. Depending on characteristics of e-healthcare data, authors proposes the use of pseudonymisation (the use of false names (pseudonym)), technique rather than anonymisation (without name) technique in e-healthcare as it will allow usage of the data to different “Healthcare Team” while protecting privacy of an individual. Also the use of different techniques to “Healthcare Team” has been proposed","PeriodicalId":251169,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)","volume":"373 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anonymisation vs. Pseudonymisation: Which one is most useful for both privacy protection and usefulness of e-healthcare data\",\"authors\":\"Rose Tinabo, F. Mtenzi, B. O'Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to sensitivity nature of the data in e-healthcare and the need of these data to different “Healthcare Team”, privacy is one of the important issues to consider for its use. Without highly consideration of privacy issues, available data will not be useful. This results in introduction of different techniques that insist privacy protection. Anonymisation and Pseudonymisation are the main methods in privacy protection. Even though they both protect privacy, their usefulness may vary depending on the usage of the data, therefore users must be able to choose a technique to use. This paper compares characteristics of anonymisation and pseudonymisation techniques in e-healthcare. Depending on characteristics of e-healthcare data, authors proposes the use of pseudonymisation (the use of false names (pseudonym)), technique rather than anonymisation (without name) technique in e-healthcare as it will allow usage of the data to different “Healthcare Team” while protecting privacy of an individual. Also the use of different techniques to “Healthcare Team” has been proposed\",\"PeriodicalId\":251169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)\",\"volume\":\"373 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

由于电子医疗数据的敏感性以及这些数据对不同“医疗团队”的需求,隐私是使用电子医疗数据时需要考虑的重要问题之一。如果不高度考虑隐私问题,可用的数据将没有用处。这导致引入了坚持隐私保护的不同技术。匿名化和假名化是隐私保护的主要手段。尽管它们都保护隐私,但它们的有用性可能因数据的使用而异,因此用户必须能够选择使用的技术。本文比较了电子医疗中匿名化和假名化技术的特点。根据电子医疗保健数据的特点,作者建议在电子医疗保健中使用假名(使用假名)技术,而不是匿名(没有姓名)技术,因为它允许将数据用于不同的“医疗保健团队”,同时保护个人隐私。此外,还提出了对“医疗团队”使用不同技术的建议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anonymisation vs. Pseudonymisation: Which one is most useful for both privacy protection and usefulness of e-healthcare data
Due to sensitivity nature of the data in e-healthcare and the need of these data to different “Healthcare Team”, privacy is one of the important issues to consider for its use. Without highly consideration of privacy issues, available data will not be useful. This results in introduction of different techniques that insist privacy protection. Anonymisation and Pseudonymisation are the main methods in privacy protection. Even though they both protect privacy, their usefulness may vary depending on the usage of the data, therefore users must be able to choose a technique to use. This paper compares characteristics of anonymisation and pseudonymisation techniques in e-healthcare. Depending on characteristics of e-healthcare data, authors proposes the use of pseudonymisation (the use of false names (pseudonym)), technique rather than anonymisation (without name) technique in e-healthcare as it will allow usage of the data to different “Healthcare Team” while protecting privacy of an individual. Also the use of different techniques to “Healthcare Team” has been proposed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信