伪米诺斯内斯特戒指及其埃及肖像

N. Marinatos, Brian Jackson
{"title":"伪米诺斯内斯特戒指及其埃及肖像","authors":"N. Marinatos, Brian Jackson","doi":"10.2458/azu_jaei_v03i2_marinatos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called Nestor Ring was found in 1924 and was accepted as authentic by Sir Arthur Evans whereas many other scholars condemned it as a forgery. In recent years, scholars have claimed its authenticity anew. This article examines the background of the find circumstances and judges them suspicious. It also adds the criterion of semantic coherence in the debate and argues that the coherence depends on Egyptian prototypes and that the use of the butterfly motif argues against the artifact’s authenticity.","PeriodicalId":237125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections","volume":"37 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pseudo-Minoan Nestor Ring and Its Egyptian Iconography\",\"authors\":\"N. Marinatos, Brian Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.2458/azu_jaei_v03i2_marinatos\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The so-called Nestor Ring was found in 1924 and was accepted as authentic by Sir Arthur Evans whereas many other scholars condemned it as a forgery. In recent years, scholars have claimed its authenticity anew. This article examines the background of the find circumstances and judges them suspicious. It also adds the criterion of semantic coherence in the debate and argues that the coherence depends on Egyptian prototypes and that the use of the butterfly motif argues against the artifact’s authenticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jaei_v03i2_marinatos\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jaei_v03i2_marinatos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

所谓的内斯特戒指于1924年被发现,并被亚瑟·埃文斯爵士认定为真品,而许多其他学者则谴责它是伪造的。近年来,学者们重新确认了它的真实性。本文考察了发现情况的背景,并判断其可疑。它还在辩论中增加了语义一致性的标准,并认为一致性取决于埃及的原型,并且蝴蝶主题的使用反驳了人工制品的真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pseudo-Minoan Nestor Ring and Its Egyptian Iconography
The so-called Nestor Ring was found in 1924 and was accepted as authentic by Sir Arthur Evans whereas many other scholars condemned it as a forgery. In recent years, scholars have claimed its authenticity anew. This article examines the background of the find circumstances and judges them suspicious. It also adds the criterion of semantic coherence in the debate and argues that the coherence depends on Egyptian prototypes and that the use of the butterfly motif argues against the artifact’s authenticity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信