契诃夫《海鸥》第一阶段的失败神话

S. Kibalnik
{"title":"契诃夫《海鸥》第一阶段的失败神话","authors":"S. Kibalnik","doi":"10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-331-341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of the “failure” of the first production of A.P. Chekhov’s “The Seagull” at the Alexandrinsky Theater is far from certain. After the relative failure of the premiere performance, painfully perceived by Chekhov himself, but, incidentally, marked by the wonderful performance of Vera Komissarzhevskaya, the first production of the play had an ordinary and even quite prosperous fate: four more performances, marked by good preparation and increasing theatrical success. As such the idea of a complete “failure” of the first production of “The Seagull” was partly man-made and came not least from the founders, followers and historians of the Moscow Art Theater, for whom it was important to emphasize its role in the creation of the new Russian theater (at the same time diminishing the role of Chekhov himself in it).","PeriodicalId":130982,"journal":{"name":"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Myth of a Failure of the First Staging Chekhov’s “The Seagull”\",\"authors\":\"S. Kibalnik\",\"doi\":\"10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-331-341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea of the “failure” of the first production of A.P. Chekhov’s “The Seagull” at the Alexandrinsky Theater is far from certain. After the relative failure of the premiere performance, painfully perceived by Chekhov himself, but, incidentally, marked by the wonderful performance of Vera Komissarzhevskaya, the first production of the play had an ordinary and even quite prosperous fate: four more performances, marked by good preparation and increasing theatrical success. As such the idea of a complete “failure” of the first production of “The Seagull” was partly man-made and came not least from the founders, followers and historians of the Moscow Art Theater, for whom it was important to emphasize its role in the creation of the new Russian theater (at the same time diminishing the role of Chekhov himself in it).\",\"PeriodicalId\":130982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-331-341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-331-341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

A.P.契诃夫(A.P. Chekhov)的《海鸥》(The Seagull)在亚历山德里斯基剧院(Alexandrinsky Theater)的首演是否会“失败”,还远不能确定。在首演相对失败之后,契诃夫自己也痛苦地感到,但顺便说一下,维拉·科米萨热夫斯卡娅的精彩表演标志着该剧的第一次演出有一个普通的,甚至是相当繁荣的命运:四场演出,以良好的准备和不断增加的戏剧成功为标志。因此,认为《海鸥》首演完全“失败”的观点在一定程度上是人为的,尤其是来自莫斯科艺术剧院(Moscow Art Theater)的创始人、追随者和历史学家。对他们来说,重要的是要强调它在创造新俄罗斯剧院中的作用(同时淡化契诃夫本人在其中的作用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Myth of a Failure of the First Staging Chekhov’s “The Seagull”
The idea of the “failure” of the first production of A.P. Chekhov’s “The Seagull” at the Alexandrinsky Theater is far from certain. After the relative failure of the premiere performance, painfully perceived by Chekhov himself, but, incidentally, marked by the wonderful performance of Vera Komissarzhevskaya, the first production of the play had an ordinary and even quite prosperous fate: four more performances, marked by good preparation and increasing theatrical success. As such the idea of a complete “failure” of the first production of “The Seagull” was partly man-made and came not least from the founders, followers and historians of the Moscow Art Theater, for whom it was important to emphasize its role in the creation of the new Russian theater (at the same time diminishing the role of Chekhov himself in it).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信