高通滤波对幅度压缩语音清晰度的影响。

S W Vargo
{"title":"高通滤波对幅度压缩语音清晰度的影响。","authors":"S W Vargo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monosyllabic triplet word intelligibility scores were obtained from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired, loudness-recruiting subjects under two experimental conditions: (1) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, linear amplification, and (2) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, compression amplification using input-to-output ratios of 5:1 and 20:1. Test materials were administered at increased sensation levels of 0, 10, 20, and 30 dB. In general, speech intelligibility was slightly enhanced for normal and hearing-impaired listeners, but only at lower sensation levels. Moreover, the improvement was observed only under the filtered, compression amplification condition for both groups. No important differences were observed between the two compression ratios used. This compression advantage may or may not be observed in clinical hearing aid evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":76027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","volume":"5 3","pages":"163-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of high pass filtering on the intelligibility of amplitude-compressed speech.\",\"authors\":\"S W Vargo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monosyllabic triplet word intelligibility scores were obtained from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired, loudness-recruiting subjects under two experimental conditions: (1) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, linear amplification, and (2) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, compression amplification using input-to-output ratios of 5:1 and 20:1. Test materials were administered at increased sensation levels of 0, 10, 20, and 30 dB. In general, speech intelligibility was slightly enhanced for normal and hearing-impaired listeners, but only at lower sensation levels. Moreover, the improvement was observed only under the filtered, compression amplification condition for both groups. No important differences were observed between the two compression ratios used. This compression advantage may or may not be observed in clinical hearing aid evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Auditory Society\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"163-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Auditory Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两种实验条件下(1)高通(1200hz)滤波线性放大和(2)高通(1200hz)滤波压缩放大,输入输出比分别为5:1和20:1,获得正常听力和听力受损、增音的单音节三联词可理解性分数。测试材料以增加的感觉水平0、10、20和30 dB进行管理。一般来说,正常和听力受损的听众的语音清晰度略有提高,但只是在较低的感觉水平上。此外,两组仅在过滤压缩放大条件下观察到改善。在使用的两种压缩比之间没有观察到重要的差异。这种压缩优势在临床助听器评估中可能观察到,也可能没有观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of high pass filtering on the intelligibility of amplitude-compressed speech.

Monosyllabic triplet word intelligibility scores were obtained from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired, loudness-recruiting subjects under two experimental conditions: (1) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, linear amplification, and (2) high-pass (1200 Hz)-filtered, compression amplification using input-to-output ratios of 5:1 and 20:1. Test materials were administered at increased sensation levels of 0, 10, 20, and 30 dB. In general, speech intelligibility was slightly enhanced for normal and hearing-impaired listeners, but only at lower sensation levels. Moreover, the improvement was observed only under the filtered, compression amplification condition for both groups. No important differences were observed between the two compression ratios used. This compression advantage may or may not be observed in clinical hearing aid evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信