在追求平价美国城市的过程中,这是一个有趣的政策和倡导案例

Steffen Wetzstein
{"title":"在追求平价美国城市的过程中,这是一个有趣的政策和倡导案例","authors":"Steffen Wetzstein","doi":"10.1177/27541258231185310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"until prices rise again. There is nothing in Phillips’ impressive toolkit of interventions that addresses corporate power and financialisation. While he calls for more public subsidy to build or acquire affordable homes, especially as a form of countercyclical state intervention, he refuses to countenance the most obvious and historically-proven measure of addressing market failure in housing: direct state intervention to break up corporate monopolies, buy land, build homes and rent direct to tenants as public housing on a not-for-profit basis. Such a solution may be politically unconscionable in a US context, but given how much of a proactive marketshaping and market-regulating role Phillips envisages for the state in his strategy, surely they are worth a proper consideration in the next edition.","PeriodicalId":206933,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Urban Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intriguing policy and advocacy case in the quest for the affordable US-City\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Wetzstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27541258231185310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"until prices rise again. There is nothing in Phillips’ impressive toolkit of interventions that addresses corporate power and financialisation. While he calls for more public subsidy to build or acquire affordable homes, especially as a form of countercyclical state intervention, he refuses to countenance the most obvious and historically-proven measure of addressing market failure in housing: direct state intervention to break up corporate monopolies, buy land, build homes and rent direct to tenants as public housing on a not-for-profit basis. Such a solution may be politically unconscionable in a US context, but given how much of a proactive marketshaping and market-regulating role Phillips envisages for the state in his strategy, surely they are worth a proper consideration in the next edition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Urban Research\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Urban Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231185310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231185310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到价格再次上涨。在菲利普斯令人印象深刻的干预工具箱中,没有任何内容涉及企业权力和金融化。尽管他呼吁为建造或购买经济适用房提供更多的公共补贴,尤其是作为一种反周期的国家干预形式,但他拒绝支持解决住房市场失灵的最明显、历史证明最有效的措施:政府直接干预,打破企业垄断,购买土地,建造房屋,并在非营利基础上作为公共住房直接租给租户。在美国的背景下,这样的解决方案在政治上可能是不合情理的,但考虑到菲利普斯在其战略中为国家设想的积极塑造市场和监管市场的角色,它们肯定值得在下一版中得到适当的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An intriguing policy and advocacy case in the quest for the affordable US-City
until prices rise again. There is nothing in Phillips’ impressive toolkit of interventions that addresses corporate power and financialisation. While he calls for more public subsidy to build or acquire affordable homes, especially as a form of countercyclical state intervention, he refuses to countenance the most obvious and historically-proven measure of addressing market failure in housing: direct state intervention to break up corporate monopolies, buy land, build homes and rent direct to tenants as public housing on a not-for-profit basis. Such a solution may be politically unconscionable in a US context, but given how much of a proactive marketshaping and market-regulating role Phillips envisages for the state in his strategy, surely they are worth a proper consideration in the next edition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信