乳腺癌检测:机器学习分类技术的比较分析

Harsh Sharma, Pooja Singh, Ayush Bhardwaj
{"title":"乳腺癌检测:机器学习分类技术的比较分析","authors":"Harsh Sharma, Pooja Singh, Ayush Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the contemporary world, the early detection of any disease has become imperative. With an accelerating rate of population, the chance of fatality by breast cancer is growing exponentially. A reliable and effective detection system helps the medical personnel in fast detection of cancer. In the course of the present study, we have presented a comparative analysis of recent state-of the-art machine learning techniques that are being extensively used in cancer detection especially Breast Cancer by using the breast cancer dataset named Wisconsin dataset. We have statistically and comparatively scrutinized and compared the machine learning techniques that are used in classification like Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGboost (XG) and Decision Tree (DT) for computing the accuracy in the light of performance metrics like recall, precision F1 score and accuracy percentage. Moreover, these classification techniques were also projected on ROC Curve. As a result, this research paper evaluates that the accuracy obtained by XGboost is 98.24% whereas in SVM the accuracy is 96.49%.","PeriodicalId":436539,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Cancer Detection: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classification Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Sharma, Pooja Singh, Ayush Bhardwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the contemporary world, the early detection of any disease has become imperative. With an accelerating rate of population, the chance of fatality by breast cancer is growing exponentially. A reliable and effective detection system helps the medical personnel in fast detection of cancer. In the course of the present study, we have presented a comparative analysis of recent state-of the-art machine learning techniques that are being extensively used in cancer detection especially Breast Cancer by using the breast cancer dataset named Wisconsin dataset. We have statistically and comparatively scrutinized and compared the machine learning techniques that are used in classification like Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGboost (XG) and Decision Tree (DT) for computing the accuracy in the light of performance metrics like recall, precision F1 score and accuracy percentage. Moreover, these classification techniques were also projected on ROC Curve. As a result, this research paper evaluates that the accuracy obtained by XGboost is 98.24% whereas in SVM the accuracy is 96.49%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI53509.2022.9758188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当代世界,任何疾病的早期发现都已变得至关重要。随着人口的加速增长,乳腺癌的死亡率呈指数级增长。一个可靠有效的检测系统有助于医务人员快速发现癌症。在本研究的过程中,我们通过使用名为威斯康星数据集的乳腺癌数据集,对最近最先进的机器学习技术进行了比较分析,这些技术被广泛用于癌症检测,特别是乳腺癌。我们对分类中使用的机器学习技术进行了统计和比较审查和比较,如Naïve贝叶斯(NB), k近邻(KNN),逻辑回归(LR),随机森林(RF),支持向量机(SVM), XGboost (XG)和决策树(DT),用于根据召回率,精度F1分数和准确率百分比等性能指标计算准确性。此外,还将这些分类技术投影到ROC曲线上。因此,本文评估XGboost的准确率为98.24%,而SVM的准确率为96.49%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast Cancer Detection: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classification Techniques
In the contemporary world, the early detection of any disease has become imperative. With an accelerating rate of population, the chance of fatality by breast cancer is growing exponentially. A reliable and effective detection system helps the medical personnel in fast detection of cancer. In the course of the present study, we have presented a comparative analysis of recent state-of the-art machine learning techniques that are being extensively used in cancer detection especially Breast Cancer by using the breast cancer dataset named Wisconsin dataset. We have statistically and comparatively scrutinized and compared the machine learning techniques that are used in classification like Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGboost (XG) and Decision Tree (DT) for computing the accuracy in the light of performance metrics like recall, precision F1 score and accuracy percentage. Moreover, these classification techniques were also projected on ROC Curve. As a result, this research paper evaluates that the accuracy obtained by XGboost is 98.24% whereas in SVM the accuracy is 96.49%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信