电动汽车PI、SMC和PI滑模控制器的性能比较

A. Ltifi, M. Ghariani, R. Neji
{"title":"电动汽车PI、SMC和PI滑模控制器的性能比较","authors":"A. Ltifi, M. Ghariani, R. Neji","doi":"10.1109/STA.2014.7086731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.","PeriodicalId":125957,"journal":{"name":"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of PI, SMC and PI-Sliding Mode Controller for EV\",\"authors\":\"A. Ltifi, M. Ghariani, R. Neji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STA.2014.7086731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2014.7086731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2014.7086731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文提出了三种不同的控制策略来控制电动汽车应用中的感应电动机。分析和比较的控制技术有:比例积分调节器(PI)、滑模控制(SMC)和PI-滑模控制(PI-SMC)。仿真结果表明,该方法在鲁棒性方面具有较好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison of PI, SMC and PI-Sliding Mode Controller for EV
This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信