网络存档的内容选择和管理:守门人vs.大众

Ian Milligan, Nick Ruest, Jimmy J. Lin
{"title":"网络存档的内容选择和管理:守门人vs.大众","authors":"Ian Milligan, Nick Ruest, Jimmy J. Lin","doi":"10.1145/2910896.2910913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any preservation effort must begin with an assessment of what content to preserve, and web archiving is no different. There have historically been two answers to the question “what should we archive?” The Internet Archive's broad entire-web crawls have been supplemented by narrower domain-or topic-specific collections gathered by numerous libraries. We can characterize this as content selection and curation by “gatekeepers”. In contrast, we have witnessed the emergence of another approach driven by “the masses” - we can archive pages that are contained in social media streams such as Twitter. The interesting question, of course, is how these approaches differ. We provide an answer to this question in the context of a case study about the 2015 Canadian federal elections. Based on our analysis, we recommend a hybrid approach that combines an effort driven by social media and more traditional curatorial methods.","PeriodicalId":109613,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content selection and curation for web archiving: The gatekeepers vs. the masses\",\"authors\":\"Ian Milligan, Nick Ruest, Jimmy J. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2910896.2910913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Any preservation effort must begin with an assessment of what content to preserve, and web archiving is no different. There have historically been two answers to the question “what should we archive?” The Internet Archive's broad entire-web crawls have been supplemented by narrower domain-or topic-specific collections gathered by numerous libraries. We can characterize this as content selection and curation by “gatekeepers”. In contrast, we have witnessed the emergence of another approach driven by “the masses” - we can archive pages that are contained in social media streams such as Twitter. The interesting question, of course, is how these approaches differ. We provide an answer to this question in the context of a case study about the 2015 Canadian federal elections. Based on our analysis, we recommend a hybrid approach that combines an effort driven by social media and more traditional curatorial methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2910913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2910913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

任何保存工作都必须从评估要保存什么内容开始,网络存档也不例外。对于“我们应该存档什么?”这个问题,历来有两种答案。互联网档案馆广泛的整个网络爬虫已经被许多图书馆收集的更狭窄的领域或特定主题的集合所补充。我们可以将其描述为“看门人”的内容选择和管理。相比之下,我们目睹了另一种由“大众”驱动的方法的出现——我们可以存档包含在社交媒体流(如Twitter)中的页面。当然,有趣的问题是这些方法有何不同。我们以2015年加拿大联邦选举的案例研究为背景,给出了这个问题的答案。根据我们的分析,我们建议采用一种混合方法,将社交媒体推动的努力与更传统的策展方法结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content selection and curation for web archiving: The gatekeepers vs. the masses
Any preservation effort must begin with an assessment of what content to preserve, and web archiving is no different. There have historically been two answers to the question “what should we archive?” The Internet Archive's broad entire-web crawls have been supplemented by narrower domain-or topic-specific collections gathered by numerous libraries. We can characterize this as content selection and curation by “gatekeepers”. In contrast, we have witnessed the emergence of another approach driven by “the masses” - we can archive pages that are contained in social media streams such as Twitter. The interesting question, of course, is how these approaches differ. We provide an answer to this question in the context of a case study about the 2015 Canadian federal elections. Based on our analysis, we recommend a hybrid approach that combines an effort driven by social media and more traditional curatorial methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信