网络行为反应与假新闻曝光与检测准确率的关系

Kevin Matthe Caramancion
{"title":"网络行为反应与假新闻曝光与检测准确率的关系","authors":"Kevin Matthe Caramancion","doi":"10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a Fake News test consisting of mixed legitimate and misleading news headlines, this study investigated and explored how the behavioral responses of users (N=153) to false headlines are associated with their ability to detect content legitimacy. The behavioral responses were (a) report the content, (b) engage in debate/discussion, or (c) simply ignore it. The results revealed that the subjects who engaged in a discussion have higher detection accuracy than the mere reporters. The participants who simply ignored the deceptive content performed the poorest while those who performed both reporting and discussion registered with the highest accuracy. The intended target audience of this paper are information scientists, digital forensic professionals, communication experts, policymakers, and other scholars possibly seeking references on this subject.","PeriodicalId":127072,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relation of Online Behavioral Response to Fake News Exposure and Detection Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Matthe Caramancion\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a Fake News test consisting of mixed legitimate and misleading news headlines, this study investigated and explored how the behavioral responses of users (N=153) to false headlines are associated with their ability to detect content legitimacy. The behavioral responses were (a) report the content, (b) engage in debate/discussion, or (c) simply ignore it. The results revealed that the subjects who engaged in a discussion have higher detection accuracy than the mere reporters. The participants who simply ignored the deceptive content performed the poorest while those who performed both reporting and discussion registered with the highest accuracy. The intended target audience of this paper are information scientists, digital forensic professionals, communication experts, policymakers, and other scholars possibly seeking references on this subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究使用由合法和误导性新闻标题混合组成的假新闻测试,调查并探讨了用户(N=153)对虚假标题的行为反应与他们检测内容合法性的能力之间的关系。行为反应是(a)报告内容,(b)参与辩论/讨论,或(c)简单地忽略它。结果表明,参与讨论的被试比单纯的报道者具有更高的检测准确率。直接忽略欺骗性内容的参与者表现最差,而同时进行报告和讨论的参与者登记的准确性最高。本文的目标受众是信息科学家、数字法医专业人员、通信专家、政策制定者和其他可能寻求这一主题参考的学者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relation of Online Behavioral Response to Fake News Exposure and Detection Accuracy
Using a Fake News test consisting of mixed legitimate and misleading news headlines, this study investigated and explored how the behavioral responses of users (N=153) to false headlines are associated with their ability to detect content legitimacy. The behavioral responses were (a) report the content, (b) engage in debate/discussion, or (c) simply ignore it. The results revealed that the subjects who engaged in a discussion have higher detection accuracy than the mere reporters. The participants who simply ignored the deceptive content performed the poorest while those who performed both reporting and discussion registered with the highest accuracy. The intended target audience of this paper are information scientists, digital forensic professionals, communication experts, policymakers, and other scholars possibly seeking references on this subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信