Sabon Kaura坑砾石粗骨料在混凝土生产中的适宜性评价

Agboola Shamsudeen Abdulazeez, Mamman Adamu Idi, Amina Omolola Suleiman, Simdima Gabriel Gideon
{"title":"Sabon Kaura坑砾石粗骨料在混凝土生产中的适宜性评价","authors":"Agboola Shamsudeen Abdulazeez, Mamman Adamu Idi, Amina Omolola Suleiman, Simdima Gabriel Gideon","doi":"10.51583/ijltemas.2021.10902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": There is global need for the preservation of natural resources. Natural resources in the world are continuously decreasing due to manufacturing of the products and this has negative impact on the environment. Aggregates constitute large ratio by weight concrete production. Recently the approach is to research for alternative that will serve the purpose of the natural aggregates in concrete for sustainable construction. One approach to contribute to sustainable construction is to partially or totally replace natural aggregates. Pit gravel is a suitable material for replacement of aggregate in concrete production. Specific gravity as well as bulk density, porosity, Impact value, crushing value for both conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out. Workability, compressive strength and flexural strength properties of concrete produced with 100% conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out with a mix ratio 1:2:3 and water-cement ratio of 0.5 were examined and compared. The concrete was tested at 3, 7, 14 and 28 days’ hydration periods. The results showed that concrete with both conventional and pit gravel has a medium workability. The highest compressive strength at 28 days was 27.53N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 26.61N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The highest flexural strength at 28 days was 5.73N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 5.67N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The strength test results indicated that conventional aggregate concrete gave better strength compared to pit gravel concrete. The research recommends use of pit gravel to fully replace conventional aggregate in concrete.","PeriodicalId":354238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suitability Assessment of Sabon Kaura Pit Gravel as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete Production\",\"authors\":\"Agboola Shamsudeen Abdulazeez, Mamman Adamu Idi, Amina Omolola Suleiman, Simdima Gabriel Gideon\",\"doi\":\"10.51583/ijltemas.2021.10902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": There is global need for the preservation of natural resources. Natural resources in the world are continuously decreasing due to manufacturing of the products and this has negative impact on the environment. Aggregates constitute large ratio by weight concrete production. Recently the approach is to research for alternative that will serve the purpose of the natural aggregates in concrete for sustainable construction. One approach to contribute to sustainable construction is to partially or totally replace natural aggregates. Pit gravel is a suitable material for replacement of aggregate in concrete production. Specific gravity as well as bulk density, porosity, Impact value, crushing value for both conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out. Workability, compressive strength and flexural strength properties of concrete produced with 100% conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out with a mix ratio 1:2:3 and water-cement ratio of 0.5 were examined and compared. The concrete was tested at 3, 7, 14 and 28 days’ hydration periods. The results showed that concrete with both conventional and pit gravel has a medium workability. The highest compressive strength at 28 days was 27.53N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 26.61N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The highest flexural strength at 28 days was 5.73N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 5.67N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The strength test results indicated that conventional aggregate concrete gave better strength compared to pit gravel concrete. The research recommends use of pit gravel to fully replace conventional aggregate in concrete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2021.10902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2021.10902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球都需要保护自然资源。由于产品的制造,世界上的自然资源不断减少,这对环境产生了负面影响。骨料在混凝土生产中占比很大。最近的方法是研究替代方案,将服务于可持续建筑的混凝土天然骨料的目的。促进可持续建筑的一种方法是部分或全部替代天然骨料。坑砾石是混凝土生产中替代骨料的合适材料。对常规骨料和坑砾石的比重、容重、孔隙度、冲击值、破碎值进行了研究。采用100%常规骨料与坑砾石配制的混凝土,以1:2:3的配合比和0.5的水灰比对混凝土的工作性、抗压强度和抗折强度进行了测试和比较。分别在水化期3、7、14、28天对混凝土进行了试验。结果表明:常规碎石和坑砾石混凝土的和易性均为中等。常规骨料混凝土28天的最高抗压强度为27.53N/mm 2,而坑砾石混凝土为26.61N/mm 2。常规骨料混凝土28天的最高抗弯强度为5.73N/mm 2,而坑砾石混凝土为5.67N/mm 2。强度试验结果表明,常规骨料混凝土的强度优于坑砾石混凝土。研究建议使用坑砾石来完全取代混凝土中的传统骨料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suitability Assessment of Sabon Kaura Pit Gravel as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete Production
: There is global need for the preservation of natural resources. Natural resources in the world are continuously decreasing due to manufacturing of the products and this has negative impact on the environment. Aggregates constitute large ratio by weight concrete production. Recently the approach is to research for alternative that will serve the purpose of the natural aggregates in concrete for sustainable construction. One approach to contribute to sustainable construction is to partially or totally replace natural aggregates. Pit gravel is a suitable material for replacement of aggregate in concrete production. Specific gravity as well as bulk density, porosity, Impact value, crushing value for both conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out. Workability, compressive strength and flexural strength properties of concrete produced with 100% conventional aggregate and pit gravel were carried out with a mix ratio 1:2:3 and water-cement ratio of 0.5 were examined and compared. The concrete was tested at 3, 7, 14 and 28 days’ hydration periods. The results showed that concrete with both conventional and pit gravel has a medium workability. The highest compressive strength at 28 days was 27.53N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 26.61N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The highest flexural strength at 28 days was 5.73N/mm 2 for conventional aggregate concrete as compared to 5.67N/mm 2 for pit gravel concrete. The strength test results indicated that conventional aggregate concrete gave better strength compared to pit gravel concrete. The research recommends use of pit gravel to fully replace conventional aggregate in concrete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信