一种不确定条件下的访问控制方法

Farzad Salim, Jason Reid, E. Dawson, U. Dulleck
{"title":"一种不确定条件下的访问控制方法","authors":"Farzad Salim, Jason Reid, E. Dawson, U. Dulleck","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2011.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In dynamic and uncertain environments such as healthcare, where the needs of security and information availability are difficult to balance, an access control approach based on a static policy will be suboptimal regardless of how comprehensive it is. The uncertainty stems from the unpredictability of users' operational needs as well as their private incentives to misuse permissions. In Role Based Access Control (RBAC), a user's legitimate access request may be denied because its need has not been anticipated by the security administrator. Alternatively, even when the policy is correctly specified an authorised user may accidentally or intentionally misuse the granted permission. This paper introduces a novel approach to access control under uncertainty and presents it in the context of RBAC. By taking insights from the field of economics, in particular the insurance literature, we propose a formal model where the value of resources are explicitly defined and an RBAC policy (entailing those predictable access needs) is only used as a reference point to determine the price each user has to pay for access, as opposed to representing hard and fast rules that are always rigidly applied.","PeriodicalId":254443,"journal":{"name":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Approach to Access Control under Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Salim, Jason Reid, E. Dawson, U. Dulleck\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2011.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In dynamic and uncertain environments such as healthcare, where the needs of security and information availability are difficult to balance, an access control approach based on a static policy will be suboptimal regardless of how comprehensive it is. The uncertainty stems from the unpredictability of users' operational needs as well as their private incentives to misuse permissions. In Role Based Access Control (RBAC), a user's legitimate access request may be denied because its need has not been anticipated by the security administrator. Alternatively, even when the policy is correctly specified an authorised user may accidentally or intentionally misuse the granted permission. This paper introduces a novel approach to access control under uncertainty and presents it in the context of RBAC. By taking insights from the field of economics, in particular the insurance literature, we propose a formal model where the value of resources are explicitly defined and an RBAC policy (entailing those predictable access needs) is only used as a reference point to determine the price each user has to pay for access, as opposed to representing hard and fast rules that are always rigidly applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2011.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2011.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

在医疗保健等动态和不确定的环境中,安全性和信息可用性的需求难以平衡,基于静态策略的访问控制方法无论多么全面,都不是最优的。这种不确定性源于用户操作需求的不可预测性以及他们滥用权限的私人动机。在基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)中,用户的合法访问请求可能会被拒绝,因为安全管理员没有预料到其需求。另外,即使正确指定了策略,授权用户也可能意外或故意滥用授予的权限。本文介绍了一种新的不确定访问控制方法,并在RBAC的背景下进行了介绍。通过从经济学领域,特别是保险文献中获取见解,我们提出了一个正式的模型,其中明确定义了资源的价值,并且RBAC策略(包含那些可预测的访问需求)仅用作确定每个用户必须为访问支付的价格的参考点,而不是表示总是严格应用的硬性规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Approach to Access Control under Uncertainty
In dynamic and uncertain environments such as healthcare, where the needs of security and information availability are difficult to balance, an access control approach based on a static policy will be suboptimal regardless of how comprehensive it is. The uncertainty stems from the unpredictability of users' operational needs as well as their private incentives to misuse permissions. In Role Based Access Control (RBAC), a user's legitimate access request may be denied because its need has not been anticipated by the security administrator. Alternatively, even when the policy is correctly specified an authorised user may accidentally or intentionally misuse the granted permission. This paper introduces a novel approach to access control under uncertainty and presents it in the context of RBAC. By taking insights from the field of economics, in particular the insurance literature, we propose a formal model where the value of resources are explicitly defined and an RBAC policy (entailing those predictable access needs) is only used as a reference point to determine the price each user has to pay for access, as opposed to representing hard and fast rules that are always rigidly applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信