A. Thal, J. Havlicek, Stephen J. Chambal, Justin W. Osgood
{"title":"建筑产品开发顺序排序:在DoDAF中的应用","authors":"A. Thal, J. Havlicek, Stephen J. Chambal, Justin W. Osgood","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2010.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) v1.5 describes 29 distinct architecture products but provides limited guidance on their development. Furthermore, existing guidance specifying a static list of products may detract from the creation of those products critical to system success. Therefore, using a unique combination of systems architecture, decision analysis, and scheduling heuristics, we analyzed the value of individual products and established associated goals for their development. A key observation from this research was the fact that the stakeholder values attributed to various products did not necessarily align with existing DoD guidance. The resulting insight enables decision-makers to more effectively guide the development and sequencing of specific products.","PeriodicalId":328811,"journal":{"name":"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequencing the Development Order of Architecture Products: An Application to DoDAF\",\"authors\":\"A. Thal, J. Havlicek, Stephen J. Chambal, Justin W. Osgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2010.475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) v1.5 describes 29 distinct architecture products but provides limited guidance on their development. Furthermore, existing guidance specifying a static list of products may detract from the creation of those products critical to system success. Therefore, using a unique combination of systems architecture, decision analysis, and scheduling heuristics, we analyzed the value of individual products and established associated goals for their development. A key observation from this research was the fact that the stakeholder values attributed to various products did not necessarily align with existing DoD guidance. The resulting insight enables decision-makers to more effectively guide the development and sequencing of specific products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sequencing the Development Order of Architecture Products: An Application to DoDAF
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) v1.5 describes 29 distinct architecture products but provides limited guidance on their development. Furthermore, existing guidance specifying a static list of products may detract from the creation of those products critical to system success. Therefore, using a unique combination of systems architecture, decision analysis, and scheduling heuristics, we analyzed the value of individual products and established associated goals for their development. A key observation from this research was the fact that the stakeholder values attributed to various products did not necessarily align with existing DoD guidance. The resulting insight enables decision-makers to more effectively guide the development and sequencing of specific products.