左心室旁路泵送时左心室输出量的逐拍预测

H. Sekii, H. Takano, Y. Taenaka, S. Takatani, H. Noda, M. Kinoshita, E. Noda, A. Yagura, T. Akutsu
{"title":"左心室旁路泵送时左心室输出量的逐拍预测","authors":"H. Sekii, H. Takano, Y. Taenaka, S. Takatani, H. Noda, M. Kinoshita, E. Noda, A. Yagura, T. Akutsu","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1988.94999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to estimate left-ventricular output from the pulse-pressure and pressure-flow relationship during left-ventricular-assist-device (LVAD) pumping, three methods were compared. The first method is based on the aortic compliance, while the second and third methods are based on the peripheral vascular resistance and the aortic impedance, respectively. Prior to clinical application, these methods were evaluated in a mock circulatory loop. The in vitro study revealed that in comparison to the electromagnetic flowmetering the second and third methods yielded higher correlation coefficients than the first method, indicating that they are more suitable for practical application during LVAD pumping.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":227170,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beat-to-beat prediction of left ventricular output during left ventricular bypass pumping\",\"authors\":\"H. Sekii, H. Takano, Y. Taenaka, S. Takatani, H. Noda, M. Kinoshita, E. Noda, A. Yagura, T. Akutsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMBS.1988.94999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to estimate left-ventricular output from the pulse-pressure and pressure-flow relationship during left-ventricular-assist-device (LVAD) pumping, three methods were compared. The first method is based on the aortic compliance, while the second and third methods are based on the peripheral vascular resistance and the aortic impedance, respectively. Prior to clinical application, these methods were evaluated in a mock circulatory loop. The in vitro study revealed that in comparison to the electromagnetic flowmetering the second and third methods yielded higher correlation coefficients than the first method, indicating that they are more suitable for practical application during LVAD pumping.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1988.94999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1988.94999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了从左心室辅助装置(LVAD)泵送时的脉压和压流关系估计左心室输出量,对三种方法进行了比较。第一种方法基于主动脉顺应性,第二种方法基于外周血管阻力,第三种方法基于主动脉阻抗。在临床应用之前,这些方法在模拟循环回路中进行了评估。体外研究表明,与电磁流量计相比,第二和第三种方法的相关系数高于第一种方法,表明它们更适合于LVAD泵送的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beat-to-beat prediction of left ventricular output during left ventricular bypass pumping
In order to estimate left-ventricular output from the pulse-pressure and pressure-flow relationship during left-ventricular-assist-device (LVAD) pumping, three methods were compared. The first method is based on the aortic compliance, while the second and third methods are based on the peripheral vascular resistance and the aortic impedance, respectively. Prior to clinical application, these methods were evaluated in a mock circulatory loop. The in vitro study revealed that in comparison to the electromagnetic flowmetering the second and third methods yielded higher correlation coefficients than the first method, indicating that they are more suitable for practical application during LVAD pumping.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信