连续或堆叠水泥胶结测井-重要吗?

H. Lohne, Øystein Arild
{"title":"连续或堆叠水泥胶结测井-重要吗?","authors":"H. Lohne, Øystein Arild","doi":"10.2118/212469-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As part of the permanent plug & abandonment of a well, the annulus casing cement sheath may be considered a barrier element provided that its integrity can be verified. Operators use a combination of data to evaluate the integrity of the casing cement sheath; cement job parameters and displacement calculations, results from FITs and LOTs, bonding logs and sustained casing pressure being the most common ones. The cement length is a key quantity for qualifying annulus cement as a well barrier element. If using the standard NORSOK D-010 rev 5 as the decision basis and provided a correct positioning, a length of 30 m MD is required when using bonding logs as the means of verification. Since the annulus cement sheath usually is considerably longer that 30 m, 30 meters of good cement can be achieved either by presenting a bond log showing 30 m of continuous good cement or by presenting a bond log that in total has 30 m of good cement.\n Operators have different requirements and views when it comes to stacked versus continuous. To better understand the implications in terms of sealing ability of a continuous annulus cements sheath versus a stacked annulus cement sheath we have conducted studies of both quantitative and qualitative nature. For a quantitative comparison we have used Darcy’s law and capillary pressure, for a qualitative comparison we have looked at cracks, shear failure and the effect of zones with a poor bond log.","PeriodicalId":255336,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous or Stacked Cement Bond Logs – Does It Matter?\",\"authors\":\"H. Lohne, Øystein Arild\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212469-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As part of the permanent plug & abandonment of a well, the annulus casing cement sheath may be considered a barrier element provided that its integrity can be verified. Operators use a combination of data to evaluate the integrity of the casing cement sheath; cement job parameters and displacement calculations, results from FITs and LOTs, bonding logs and sustained casing pressure being the most common ones. The cement length is a key quantity for qualifying annulus cement as a well barrier element. If using the standard NORSOK D-010 rev 5 as the decision basis and provided a correct positioning, a length of 30 m MD is required when using bonding logs as the means of verification. Since the annulus cement sheath usually is considerably longer that 30 m, 30 meters of good cement can be achieved either by presenting a bond log showing 30 m of continuous good cement or by presenting a bond log that in total has 30 m of good cement.\\n Operators have different requirements and views when it comes to stacked versus continuous. To better understand the implications in terms of sealing ability of a continuous annulus cements sheath versus a stacked annulus cement sheath we have conducted studies of both quantitative and qualitative nature. For a quantitative comparison we have used Darcy’s law and capillary pressure, for a qualitative comparison we have looked at cracks, shear failure and the effect of zones with a poor bond log.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212469-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212469-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为永久封井和弃井的一部分,环空套管水泥环可以被认为是一个屏障元件,前提是它的完整性可以得到验证。作业者使用综合数据来评估套管水泥环的完整性;固井作业参数和驱替计算、fit和lot的结果、胶结测井和持续套管压力是最常见的。固井长度是决定环空固井是否能作为井眼屏障的关键指标。如果使用标准NORSOK D-010 rev 5作为决策依据并提供正确的定位,则在使用粘合日志作为验证手段时,需要30 m MD长度。由于环空水泥环通常比30米长得多,因此30米的良好水泥可以通过提供显示30米连续良好水泥的粘合测井或提供总计30米良好水泥的粘合测井来实现。当涉及到堆叠和连续时,运营商有不同的需求和观点。为了更好地了解连续环空水泥环与堆叠环空水泥环的密封能力,我们进行了定量和定性研究。为了进行定量比较,我们使用了达西定律和毛管压力,为了进行定性比较,我们研究了裂缝、剪切破坏和胶结测井差的区域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous or Stacked Cement Bond Logs – Does It Matter?
As part of the permanent plug & abandonment of a well, the annulus casing cement sheath may be considered a barrier element provided that its integrity can be verified. Operators use a combination of data to evaluate the integrity of the casing cement sheath; cement job parameters and displacement calculations, results from FITs and LOTs, bonding logs and sustained casing pressure being the most common ones. The cement length is a key quantity for qualifying annulus cement as a well barrier element. If using the standard NORSOK D-010 rev 5 as the decision basis and provided a correct positioning, a length of 30 m MD is required when using bonding logs as the means of verification. Since the annulus cement sheath usually is considerably longer that 30 m, 30 meters of good cement can be achieved either by presenting a bond log showing 30 m of continuous good cement or by presenting a bond log that in total has 30 m of good cement. Operators have different requirements and views when it comes to stacked versus continuous. To better understand the implications in terms of sealing ability of a continuous annulus cements sheath versus a stacked annulus cement sheath we have conducted studies of both quantitative and qualitative nature. For a quantitative comparison we have used Darcy’s law and capillary pressure, for a qualitative comparison we have looked at cracks, shear failure and the effect of zones with a poor bond log.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信