不要做土地改革:一个简单的定理

M. Sousa, V. S. Duarte
{"title":"不要做土地改革:一个简单的定理","authors":"M. Sousa, V. S. Duarte","doi":"10.2047/ijltfesvol6iss4-1210-1221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assess the general impact of land reforms on growth using human capital growth models due to Arrow (1962) - the main newness of the paper- after surveying the literature and building a typology. Thus, we conclude that land reform can yet been used as a modern tool to spur growth and development, but with our approach we can define the main limits and constraints that can block this growth.  We conclude that a raise in undifferentiated wages after land reform leads to an unrecoverable society welfare loss; thus, yielding a lesson to political agents’ decision-makers elected after land reforms – wage raise land reform should not be used as an electoral motto.","PeriodicalId":320274,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don´t do Land Reform: a simple theorem\",\"authors\":\"M. Sousa, V. S. Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.2047/ijltfesvol6iss4-1210-1221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assess the general impact of land reforms on growth using human capital growth models due to Arrow (1962) - the main newness of the paper- after surveying the literature and building a typology. Thus, we conclude that land reform can yet been used as a modern tool to spur growth and development, but with our approach we can define the main limits and constraints that can block this growth.  We conclude that a raise in undifferentiated wages after land reform leads to an unrecoverable society welfare loss; thus, yielding a lesson to political agents’ decision-makers elected after land reforms – wage raise land reform should not be used as an electoral motto.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2047/ijltfesvol6iss4-1210-1221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2047/ijltfesvol6iss4-1210-1221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在调查文献并建立类型学之后,我们使用Arrow(1962)提出的人力资本增长模型来评估土地改革对经济增长的总体影响。因此,我们得出的结论是,土地改革仍然可以作为刺激增长和发展的现代工具,但通过我们的方法,我们可以确定阻碍这种增长的主要限制和制约因素。我们的结论是,土地改革后无差别工资的提高导致了不可弥补的社会福利损失;因此,给土地改革后选出的政治代理人的决策者一个教训——提高工资——土地改革不应该被用作选举的座右铭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Don´t do Land Reform: a simple theorem
We assess the general impact of land reforms on growth using human capital growth models due to Arrow (1962) - the main newness of the paper- after surveying the literature and building a typology. Thus, we conclude that land reform can yet been used as a modern tool to spur growth and development, but with our approach we can define the main limits and constraints that can block this growth.  We conclude that a raise in undifferentiated wages after land reform leads to an unrecoverable society welfare loss; thus, yielding a lesson to political agents’ decision-makers elected after land reforms – wage raise land reform should not be used as an electoral motto.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信