基于高斯波束求和法的雷达目标RCS。实验评价

H. Ghanmi, A. Khenchaf, P. Pouliguen, P. O. Leye
{"title":"基于高斯波束求和法的雷达目标RCS。实验评价","authors":"H. Ghanmi, A. Khenchaf, P. Pouliguen, P. O. Leye","doi":"10.23919/IRS.2018.8448088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an experimental validation of the numerical simulations of RCS using Gaussian Beam Summation method (GBS) in X band. In the high-frequency approximation, the main advantages of the GBS over ray method are related to the caustic problem. In this paper, the performance of GBS is illustrated with numerical and experimental evaluations of RCS of radar targets (flat plate, shell cylinder and a hollow cylinder with an aperture). The GBS method has been compared with Gaussian Beam Launching (GBL), classical Physical Optic (PO), and Method of Moment (MoM) and with experimental measurements. The experimental measurements have been realized in the anechoic chamber of the Lab-STICC (ENSTA Bretagne).","PeriodicalId":436201,"journal":{"name":"2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RCS of Radar Targets using Gaussian Beam Summation Method. Experimental Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"H. Ghanmi, A. Khenchaf, P. Pouliguen, P. O. Leye\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/IRS.2018.8448088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an experimental validation of the numerical simulations of RCS using Gaussian Beam Summation method (GBS) in X band. In the high-frequency approximation, the main advantages of the GBS over ray method are related to the caustic problem. In this paper, the performance of GBS is illustrated with numerical and experimental evaluations of RCS of radar targets (flat plate, shell cylinder and a hollow cylinder with an aperture). The GBS method has been compared with Gaussian Beam Launching (GBL), classical Physical Optic (PO), and Method of Moment (MoM) and with experimental measurements. The experimental measurements have been realized in the anechoic chamber of the Lab-STICC (ENSTA Bretagne).\",\"PeriodicalId\":436201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/IRS.2018.8448088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/IRS.2018.8448088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文利用高斯波束求和法(GBS)在X波段对RCS进行了数值模拟实验验证。在高频近似中,GBS法优于射线法的主要优点与焦散问题有关。本文通过对雷达目标(平板、壳柱和带孔径的空心柱)的RCS进行数值和实验评估,说明了GBS的性能。将GBS方法与高斯光束发射(GBL)、经典物理光学(PO)和矩量法(MoM)进行了比较,并与实验测量结果进行了比较。实验测量是在sticc (ENSTA Bretagne)实验室的消声室中实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RCS of Radar Targets using Gaussian Beam Summation Method. Experimental Evaluation
We present an experimental validation of the numerical simulations of RCS using Gaussian Beam Summation method (GBS) in X band. In the high-frequency approximation, the main advantages of the GBS over ray method are related to the caustic problem. In this paper, the performance of GBS is illustrated with numerical and experimental evaluations of RCS of radar targets (flat plate, shell cylinder and a hollow cylinder with an aperture). The GBS method has been compared with Gaussian Beam Launching (GBL), classical Physical Optic (PO), and Method of Moment (MoM) and with experimental measurements. The experimental measurements have been realized in the anechoic chamber of the Lab-STICC (ENSTA Bretagne).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信