评估信息可视化

K. Andrews
{"title":"评估信息可视化","authors":"K. Andrews","doi":"10.1145/1168149.1168151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more experience is being gained with the evaluation of information visualisation interfaces, weaknesses in current evaluation practice are coming to the fore.This position paper presents an overview of currently used evaluation methods, followed by a discussion of my experiences and lessons learned from a series of studies comparing hierarchy browsers.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating information visualisations\",\"authors\":\"K. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1168149.1168151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As more experience is being gained with the evaluation of information visualisation interfaces, weaknesses in current evaluation practice are coming to the fore.This position paper presents an overview of currently used evaluation methods, followed by a discussion of my experiences and lessons learned from a series of studies comparing hierarchy browsers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

随着信息可视化界面评价经验的不断积累,当前评价实践中的不足也逐渐显现出来。本文概述了当前使用的评估方法,然后讨论了我从一系列比较层次浏览器的研究中获得的经验和教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating information visualisations
As more experience is being gained with the evaluation of information visualisation interfaces, weaknesses in current evaluation practice are coming to the fore.This position paper presents an overview of currently used evaluation methods, followed by a discussion of my experiences and lessons learned from a series of studies comparing hierarchy browsers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信