验证1.26亿条MARC记录

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage Pub Date : 2019-05-08 DOI:10.1145/3322905.3322929

P. Király

{"title":"验证1.26亿条MARC记录","authors":"P. Király","doi":"10.1145/3322905.3322929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes the method and results of validation of 14 library catalogues. The format of the catalog record is Machine Readable Catalog (MARC21) which is the most popular metadata standards for describing books. The research investigates the structural features of the record and as a result finds and classifies different commonly found issues. The most frequent issue types are usage of undocumented schema elements, then improper values in places where a value should be taken from a dictionary, or should match to other strict requirements.","PeriodicalId":418911,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating 126 million MARC records\",\"authors\":\"P. Király\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3322905.3322929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper describes the method and results of validation of 14 library catalogues. The format of the catalog record is Machine Readable Catalog (MARC21) which is the most popular metadata standards for describing books. The research investigates the structural features of the record and as a result finds and classifies different commonly found issues. The most frequent issue types are usage of undocumented schema elements, then improper values in places where a value should be taken from a dictionary, or should match to other strict requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3322905.3322929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3322905.3322929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

本文介绍了对14种图书目录进行验证的方法和结果。目录记录的格式是机器可读目录(MARC21)，这是最流行的描述图书的元数据标准。本研究考察了档案的结构特征，从而发现并分类了不同的常见问题。最常见的问题类型是使用未记录的模式元素，然后在应该从字典中获取值的地方使用不正确的值，或者应该匹配其他严格的要求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validating 126 million MARC records

The paper describes the method and results of validation of 14 library catalogues. The format of the catalog record is Machine Readable Catalog (MARC21) which is the most popular metadata standards for describing books. The research investigates the structural features of the record and as a result finds and classifies different commonly found issues. The most frequent issue types are usage of undocumented schema elements, then improper values in places where a value should be taken from a dictionary, or should match to other strict requirements.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage

自引率

0.00%

发文量