依恋如何改变我的姑息治疗实践:发现姑息治疗悖论

Christiaan Rhodius
{"title":"依恋如何改变我的姑息治疗实践:发现姑息治疗悖论","authors":"Christiaan Rhodius","doi":"10.33212/att.v17n1.2023.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attachment theory described by John Bowlby greatly influenced the perception of relationships. The theory proposes a framework for thinking about relationships—the propensity of mankind to seek closeness to particular others. Attachment behaviour and the longing for a secure base are focal points within the concept of attachment. Both are thought to play a role from cradle to grave. In palliative care (with approaching death as the ultimate threat to connection) dynamics in relationships will inevitably change. This article introduces the concept of “the palliative paradox”, a perspective on dynamics within the relational realm. It provides a framework for clinical thinking and points to possible interventions. It can also be used as a means of psycho-education for patients and family. As such “the palliative paradox” can provide insight for clinicians, patients, and family alike. This enables all involved into becoming and being a secure base for each other. The presence of a secure base amidst the process of separation makes it possible to die connected. Thereby increasing the quality of life, the focal point of palliative care.","PeriodicalId":296880,"journal":{"name":"Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How attachment transformed my palliative practice: discovering the palliative paradox\",\"authors\":\"Christiaan Rhodius\",\"doi\":\"10.33212/att.v17n1.2023.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Attachment theory described by John Bowlby greatly influenced the perception of relationships. The theory proposes a framework for thinking about relationships—the propensity of mankind to seek closeness to particular others. Attachment behaviour and the longing for a secure base are focal points within the concept of attachment. Both are thought to play a role from cradle to grave. In palliative care (with approaching death as the ultimate threat to connection) dynamics in relationships will inevitably change. This article introduces the concept of “the palliative paradox”, a perspective on dynamics within the relational realm. It provides a framework for clinical thinking and points to possible interventions. It can also be used as a means of psycho-education for patients and family. As such “the palliative paradox” can provide insight for clinicians, patients, and family alike. This enables all involved into becoming and being a secure base for each other. The presence of a secure base amidst the process of separation makes it possible to die connected. Thereby increasing the quality of life, the focal point of palliative care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33212/att.v17n1.2023.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment: New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/att.v17n1.2023.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

John Bowlby的依恋理论对人际关系的感知产生了很大的影响。该理论提出了一个思考人际关系的框架——人类寻求与特定他人亲近的倾向。依恋行为和对安全基础的渴望是依恋概念的焦点。两者都被认为扮演着从出生到死亡的角色。在姑息治疗中(即将到来的死亡是对联系的终极威胁),关系中的动态将不可避免地发生变化。本文介绍了“姑息性悖论”的概念,这是对关系领域内动态的一种看法。它为临床思维提供了一个框架,并指出了可能的干预措施。也可作为对患者及家属进行心理教育的一种手段。因此,“姑息疗法悖论”可以为临床医生、患者和家属提供见解。这使所有参与者成为彼此的安全基础。在分离过程中有一个安全的基地,这使得死亡连接成为可能。从而提高生活质量,是姑息治疗的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How attachment transformed my palliative practice: discovering the palliative paradox
Attachment theory described by John Bowlby greatly influenced the perception of relationships. The theory proposes a framework for thinking about relationships—the propensity of mankind to seek closeness to particular others. Attachment behaviour and the longing for a secure base are focal points within the concept of attachment. Both are thought to play a role from cradle to grave. In palliative care (with approaching death as the ultimate threat to connection) dynamics in relationships will inevitably change. This article introduces the concept of “the palliative paradox”, a perspective on dynamics within the relational realm. It provides a framework for clinical thinking and points to possible interventions. It can also be used as a means of psycho-education for patients and family. As such “the palliative paradox” can provide insight for clinicians, patients, and family alike. This enables all involved into becoming and being a secure base for each other. The presence of a secure base amidst the process of separation makes it possible to die connected. Thereby increasing the quality of life, the focal point of palliative care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信