根据国家综合癌症网络风险分层,多参数磁共振成像对前列腺癌外展预测的影响

J. Kang, Jun-Koo Kang, J. Chung, Y. Ha, S. Choi, B. Kim, H. T. Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, E. Yoo, See Hyung Kim, G. Yoon, J. N. Lee, T. Kwon
{"title":"根据国家综合癌症网络风险分层,多参数磁共振成像对前列腺癌外展预测的影响","authors":"J. Kang, Jun-Koo Kang, J. Chung, Y. Ha, S. Choi, B. Kim, H. T. Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, E. Yoo, See Hyung Kim, G. Yoon, J. N. Lee, T. Kwon","doi":"10.22465/juo.234600160008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The accuracy of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the effect of mpMRI for EPE prediction in the final pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification in patients with clinically localized PCa.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 340 consecutive patients diagnosed with clinically localized PCa who underwent RP with preoperative mpMRI between March 2020 and December 2021. They were stratified according to the NCCN risk stratification into low (LR), favorable intermediate (FIR), unfavorable intermediate (UIR), and high risk (HR) groups to assess final pathological EPE. The accuracy of staging mpMRI was assessed in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the predictors of EPE in the final pathology after RP.Results: Preoperative mpMRI showed suspicious EPE in 87 patients (25.6%), whereas postoperative pathological evaluation revealed EPE in 137 patients (40.3%). The LR group showed relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive value compared with other groups. In the multivariate analysis, suspicious EPE on mpMRI was a significant predictive factor for EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups (p=0.012, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), whereas no correlation was observed in the LR group (p=0.711).Conclusions: A strong correlation was observed between suspicious EPE on mpMRI and EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups but not in the LR group.","PeriodicalId":125788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urologic Oncology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer\",\"authors\":\"J. Kang, Jun-Koo Kang, J. Chung, Y. Ha, S. Choi, B. Kim, H. T. Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, E. Yoo, See Hyung Kim, G. Yoon, J. N. Lee, T. Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.22465/juo.234600160008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The accuracy of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the effect of mpMRI for EPE prediction in the final pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification in patients with clinically localized PCa.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 340 consecutive patients diagnosed with clinically localized PCa who underwent RP with preoperative mpMRI between March 2020 and December 2021. They were stratified according to the NCCN risk stratification into low (LR), favorable intermediate (FIR), unfavorable intermediate (UIR), and high risk (HR) groups to assess final pathological EPE. The accuracy of staging mpMRI was assessed in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the predictors of EPE in the final pathology after RP.Results: Preoperative mpMRI showed suspicious EPE in 87 patients (25.6%), whereas postoperative pathological evaluation revealed EPE in 137 patients (40.3%). The LR group showed relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive value compared with other groups. In the multivariate analysis, suspicious EPE on mpMRI was a significant predictive factor for EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups (p=0.012, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), whereas no correlation was observed in the LR group (p=0.711).Conclusions: A strong correlation was observed between suspicious EPE on mpMRI and EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups but not in the LR group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urologic Oncology\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22465/juo.234600160008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22465/juo.234600160008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)前列腺外展(EPE)对前列腺癌(PCa)术前分期的准确性仍存在争议。本研究旨在根据国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)风险分层,确定mpMRI在临床局限性前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后最终病理中EPE预测的作用。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了340例连续诊断为临床局限性PCa的患者,这些患者在2020年3月至2021年12月期间通过术前mpMRI进行了RP。根据NCCN风险分层,将患者分为低(LR)、有利中度(FIR)、不利中度(UIR)和高风险(HR)组,以评估最终病理性EPE。评估各组mpMRI分期的准确性。单因素和多因素分析评估了RP后最终病理中EPE的预测因素。结果:术前mpMRI显示疑似EPE 87例(25.6%),术后病理检查显示疑似EPE 137例(40.3%)。与其他组相比,LR组的敏感性较低,阳性预测值较低。在多因素分析中,mpMRI上可疑的EPE是FIR组、UIR组和HR组最终病理中EPE的重要预测因素(p=0.012、p=0.011和p=0.001),而LR组无相关性(p=0.711)。结论:在FIR、UIR和HR组中,mpMRI上可疑的EPE与最终病理的EPE有很强的相关性,而在LR组中没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer
Purpose: The accuracy of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the effect of mpMRI for EPE prediction in the final pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification in patients with clinically localized PCa.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 340 consecutive patients diagnosed with clinically localized PCa who underwent RP with preoperative mpMRI between March 2020 and December 2021. They were stratified according to the NCCN risk stratification into low (LR), favorable intermediate (FIR), unfavorable intermediate (UIR), and high risk (HR) groups to assess final pathological EPE. The accuracy of staging mpMRI was assessed in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the predictors of EPE in the final pathology after RP.Results: Preoperative mpMRI showed suspicious EPE in 87 patients (25.6%), whereas postoperative pathological evaluation revealed EPE in 137 patients (40.3%). The LR group showed relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive value compared with other groups. In the multivariate analysis, suspicious EPE on mpMRI was a significant predictive factor for EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups (p=0.012, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), whereas no correlation was observed in the LR group (p=0.711).Conclusions: A strong correlation was observed between suspicious EPE on mpMRI and EPE in the final pathology in the FIR, UIR, and HR groups but not in the LR group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信