更大的是谁?计算机科学家的真正排名是什么

S. Skiena, Charles B. Ward
{"title":"更大的是谁?计算机科学家的真正排名是什么","authors":"S. Skiena, Charles B. Ward","doi":"10.1080/17498430.2017.1317979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have developed algorithms that measure the relative historical significance of the over 800,000 people appearing in Wikipedia, producing significance rankings that correlate well with a wide variety of validation criteria. In our book Who's bigger?: where historical figures really rank (Skiena and Ward 2013), we use our significance scores to provide insight into a variety of historical and cultural questions. Here we apply our significance measure to study several issues related to the history and stature of computing. Who are the most historically significant computer scientists? The most significant Turing award winners? The Turing award purports to be the ‘Nobel Prize of Computing’, but does the stature of these awards really compare? Our answers to all these questions prove revealing. To lend credence to our findings, we describe our ranking methodology and validation criteria. Our complete rankings for all historical figures in Wikipedia are available for inspection at http://www.whoisbigger.com.","PeriodicalId":211442,"journal":{"name":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who's bigger? Where computer scientists really rank\",\"authors\":\"S. Skiena, Charles B. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17498430.2017.1317979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have developed algorithms that measure the relative historical significance of the over 800,000 people appearing in Wikipedia, producing significance rankings that correlate well with a wide variety of validation criteria. In our book Who's bigger?: where historical figures really rank (Skiena and Ward 2013), we use our significance scores to provide insight into a variety of historical and cultural questions. Here we apply our significance measure to study several issues related to the history and stature of computing. Who are the most historically significant computer scientists? The most significant Turing award winners? The Turing award purports to be the ‘Nobel Prize of Computing’, but does the stature of these awards really compare? Our answers to all these questions prove revealing. To lend credence to our findings, we describe our ranking methodology and validation criteria. Our complete rankings for all historical figures in Wikipedia are available for inspection at http://www.whoisbigger.com.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2017.1317979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2017.1317979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们开发了一种算法,可以衡量出现在维基百科上的80多万人的相对历史重要性,产生与各种验证标准密切相关的重要性排名。在我们的书中谁更大?在历史人物真正排名的地方(Skiena和Ward 2013),我们使用我们的显著性分数来提供对各种历史和文化问题的见解。在这里,我们应用我们的显著性度量来研究与计算的历史和地位有关的几个问题。谁是历史上最重要的计算机科学家?最重要的图灵奖得主是谁?图灵奖号称是“计算机领域的诺贝尔奖”,但这些奖项的地位真的能相提并论吗?我们对所有这些问题的回答都证明了这一点。为了让我们的发现更可信,我们描述了我们的排名方法和验证标准。我们对维基百科中所有历史人物的完整排名可以在http://www.whoisbigger.com上查看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who's bigger? Where computer scientists really rank
We have developed algorithms that measure the relative historical significance of the over 800,000 people appearing in Wikipedia, producing significance rankings that correlate well with a wide variety of validation criteria. In our book Who's bigger?: where historical figures really rank (Skiena and Ward 2013), we use our significance scores to provide insight into a variety of historical and cultural questions. Here we apply our significance measure to study several issues related to the history and stature of computing. Who are the most historically significant computer scientists? The most significant Turing award winners? The Turing award purports to be the ‘Nobel Prize of Computing’, but does the stature of these awards really compare? Our answers to all these questions prove revealing. To lend credence to our findings, we describe our ranking methodology and validation criteria. Our complete rankings for all historical figures in Wikipedia are available for inspection at http://www.whoisbigger.com.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信