{"title":"个人消费与单身人士:对托马斯·r·爱尔兰的回复","authors":"K. Krueger","doi":"10.5085/JFE.24.1.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After an exchange of comments, Ireland now agrees that could-based lost support analysis is appropriate as long as “could” is not represented as “would.” So, regarding the forensic economic convention of “could” or “contingent” based analysis in wrongful death, our exchange nets to zero.","PeriodicalId":265321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Consumption and Single Persons: A Reply to Thomas R. Ireland\",\"authors\":\"K. Krueger\",\"doi\":\"10.5085/JFE.24.1.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After an exchange of comments, Ireland now agrees that could-based lost support analysis is appropriate as long as “could” is not represented as “would.” So, regarding the forensic economic convention of “could” or “contingent” based analysis in wrongful death, our exchange nets to zero.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Economics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5085/JFE.24.1.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5085/JFE.24.1.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personal Consumption and Single Persons: A Reply to Thomas R. Ireland
After an exchange of comments, Ireland now agrees that could-based lost support analysis is appropriate as long as “could” is not represented as “would.” So, regarding the forensic economic convention of “could” or “contingent” based analysis in wrongful death, our exchange nets to zero.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
