学校表现衡量的结果——机会和机会的不平等

A. Hardy
{"title":"学校表现衡量的结果——机会和机会的不平等","authors":"A. Hardy","doi":"10.18546/RET.34.2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses the potential impact of two performance measures on equality of access to a general education for all pupils. It argues that government policy, which on the surface appears to facilitate equality of opportunity, is in fact marginalising some school subjects and appropriate qualifications. Focussing on the subject design and technology (D&T), this paper illustrates the potentially limiting effect of school performance measures on pupils' opportunity for a broad and balanced education. \n \nThis paper has four parts. This paper firstly explains two government school performance policies that are the context for the decline, secondly it presents three scenarios where pupils are guided to study certain qualifications, thirdly it proposes how these scenarios might lead to a narrowing of the D&T curriculum content, the final section presents arguments why D&T is an important component of all pupils' education. \n \nD&T is used to illustrate the consequence of school performance measures that is relevant to other marginalised subjects. Therefore, this paper will be of interest to others who represent subjects, such as art and design, drama and music. The five reasons for D&T as part of a general education could be reframed for other subjects.","PeriodicalId":314595,"journal":{"name":"Race Equality Teaching","volume":"408 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The consequence of school performance measures – inequality of access and opportunity\",\"authors\":\"A. Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.18546/RET.34.2.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper assesses the potential impact of two performance measures on equality of access to a general education for all pupils. It argues that government policy, which on the surface appears to facilitate equality of opportunity, is in fact marginalising some school subjects and appropriate qualifications. Focussing on the subject design and technology (D&T), this paper illustrates the potentially limiting effect of school performance measures on pupils' opportunity for a broad and balanced education. \\n \\nThis paper has four parts. This paper firstly explains two government school performance policies that are the context for the decline, secondly it presents three scenarios where pupils are guided to study certain qualifications, thirdly it proposes how these scenarios might lead to a narrowing of the D&T curriculum content, the final section presents arguments why D&T is an important component of all pupils' education. \\n \\nD&T is used to illustrate the consequence of school performance measures that is relevant to other marginalised subjects. Therefore, this paper will be of interest to others who represent subjects, such as art and design, drama and music. The five reasons for D&T as part of a general education could be reframed for other subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Race Equality Teaching\",\"volume\":\"408 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Race Equality Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18546/RET.34.2.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race Equality Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18546/RET.34.2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文评估了两项绩效指标对所有学生平等接受普通教育的潜在影响。它认为,表面上看似促进机会平等的政府政策,实际上正在边缘化一些学校科目和适当的资格。本文着重于主题设计和技术(D&T),说明了学校绩效衡量对学生获得广泛和均衡教育机会的潜在限制作用。本文共分为四个部分。本文首先解释了两种政府学校绩效政策,这是下降的背景,其次,它提出了学生被引导学习某些资格的三种情况,第三,它提出了这些情况如何可能导致D&T课程内容的缩小,最后一节提出了为什么D&T是所有学生教育的重要组成部分的论点。D&T被用来说明与其他边缘化科目相关的学校表现衡量的后果。因此,这篇论文将对其他代表学科的人感兴趣,比如艺术和设计,戏剧和音乐。D&T作为通识教育一部分的五个原因可以重新定义为其他科目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The consequence of school performance measures – inequality of access and opportunity
This paper assesses the potential impact of two performance measures on equality of access to a general education for all pupils. It argues that government policy, which on the surface appears to facilitate equality of opportunity, is in fact marginalising some school subjects and appropriate qualifications. Focussing on the subject design and technology (D&T), this paper illustrates the potentially limiting effect of school performance measures on pupils' opportunity for a broad and balanced education. This paper has four parts. This paper firstly explains two government school performance policies that are the context for the decline, secondly it presents three scenarios where pupils are guided to study certain qualifications, thirdly it proposes how these scenarios might lead to a narrowing of the D&T curriculum content, the final section presents arguments why D&T is an important component of all pupils' education. D&T is used to illustrate the consequence of school performance measures that is relevant to other marginalised subjects. Therefore, this paper will be of interest to others who represent subjects, such as art and design, drama and music. The five reasons for D&T as part of a general education could be reframed for other subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信