经典指纹vs量子指纹

B. Sanders
{"title":"经典指纹vs量子指纹","authors":"B. Sanders","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2005.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When communication is expensive, the important task of testing two binary strings for equality can be achieved by generating relatively short fingerprints of each string and comparing those fingerprints. Quantum fingerprinting, in which the fingerprint is encoded onto qubits (the quantum version of the bit), is significantly less expensive: exponentially better in the case of no shared randomness and potentially perfect for the case of shared entanglement. Single-qubit quantum fingerprinting is feasible, and we have demonstrated its advantages theoretically and experimentally","PeriodicalId":340578,"journal":{"name":"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical vs Quantum Fingerprinting\",\"authors\":\"B. Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2005.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When communication is expensive, the important task of testing two binary strings for equality can be achieved by generating relatively short fingerprints of each string and comparing those fingerprints. Quantum fingerprinting, in which the fingerprint is encoded onto qubits (the quantum version of the bit), is significantly less expensive: exponentially better in the case of no shared randomness and potentially perfect for the case of shared entanglement. Single-qubit quantum fingerprinting is feasible, and we have demonstrated its advantages theoretically and experimentally\",\"PeriodicalId\":340578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2005.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2005.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当通信开销较大时,测试两个二进制字符串是否相等的重要任务可以通过为每个字符串生成相对较短的指纹并比较这些指纹来实现。在量子指纹识别技术中,指纹被编码到量子位(比特的量子版本)上,它的成本要低得多:在没有共享随机性的情况下,它的成本要高得多,在共享纠缠的情况下,它可能是完美的。单量子比特的量子指纹识别是可行的,我们已经从理论上和实验上证明了它的优势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classical vs Quantum Fingerprinting
When communication is expensive, the important task of testing two binary strings for equality can be achieved by generating relatively short fingerprints of each string and comparing those fingerprints. Quantum fingerprinting, in which the fingerprint is encoded onto qubits (the quantum version of the bit), is significantly less expensive: exponentially better in the case of no shared randomness and potentially perfect for the case of shared entanglement. Single-qubit quantum fingerprinting is feasible, and we have demonstrated its advantages theoretically and experimentally
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信