1552年喀山陷落:来源批判视角下的定量评价

N. Belov
{"title":"1552年喀山陷落:来源批判视角下的定量评价","authors":"N. Belov","doi":"10.31860/2712-7591-2022-2-32-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes examples of scholars’ uncritical use of quantitative data from narrative sources concerning the siege and capture of Kazan by the army of Tsar Ivan IV in 1552. Since Karamzin, the prevailing belief has been that the Russian army was 150,000 men strong. This number, however, is the result of an error or of a deliberate correction made by the compiler of the Morozov Chronicle of the 1750–1760s. The information about the 740 captives caught by the Russians in the battle on the Arsk field near Kazan is also explained by a mistake of the scribe who copied the Voskresensky copy of «Posledovanie drevnim». The author of the article comes to the conclusion that an analysis of written accounts of the history of Kazan’s capture requires a comprehensive approach.","PeriodicalId":134383,"journal":{"name":"Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CAPTURE OF KAZAN IN 1552: A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT FROM A SOURCE CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE\",\"authors\":\"N. Belov\",\"doi\":\"10.31860/2712-7591-2022-2-32-54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes examples of scholars’ uncritical use of quantitative data from narrative sources concerning the siege and capture of Kazan by the army of Tsar Ivan IV in 1552. Since Karamzin, the prevailing belief has been that the Russian army was 150,000 men strong. This number, however, is the result of an error or of a deliberate correction made by the compiler of the Morozov Chronicle of the 1750–1760s. The information about the 740 captives caught by the Russians in the battle on the Arsk field near Kazan is also explained by a mistake of the scribe who copied the Voskresensky copy of «Posledovanie drevnim». The author of the article comes to the conclusion that an analysis of written accounts of the history of Kazan’s capture requires a comprehensive approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2022-2-32-54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2022-2-32-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了一些学者不加批判地使用叙事性资料中的定量数据的例子,这些叙事性资料涉及1552年沙皇伊凡四世的军队围攻和占领喀山。自卡拉姆津战役以来,人们普遍认为俄罗斯军队有15万人。然而,这个数字是1750 - 1760年代《莫罗佐夫编年史》编纂者的错误或故意更正的结果。关于在喀山附近的阿尔斯克战场上被俄国人俘虏的740名战俘的信息也被解释为抄写Voskresensky副本的“Posledovanie drevnim”的错误。这篇文章的作者得出的结论是,对喀山被占领历史的书面记录进行分析需要一个全面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CAPTURE OF KAZAN IN 1552: A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT FROM A SOURCE CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE
The article analyzes examples of scholars’ uncritical use of quantitative data from narrative sources concerning the siege and capture of Kazan by the army of Tsar Ivan IV in 1552. Since Karamzin, the prevailing belief has been that the Russian army was 150,000 men strong. This number, however, is the result of an error or of a deliberate correction made by the compiler of the Morozov Chronicle of the 1750–1760s. The information about the 740 captives caught by the Russians in the battle on the Arsk field near Kazan is also explained by a mistake of the scribe who copied the Voskresensky copy of «Posledovanie drevnim». The author of the article comes to the conclusion that an analysis of written accounts of the history of Kazan’s capture requires a comprehensive approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信