喷砂是否能提高纳米陶瓷树脂与两种不同的复合材料之间的结合强度?

A. Davide, Augusti Gabriele, Cerutti Francesca, D. Re
{"title":"喷砂是否能提高纳米陶瓷树脂与两种不同的复合材料之间的结合强度?","authors":"A. Davide, Augusti Gabriele, Cerutti Francesca, D. Re","doi":"10.4172/2090-5025.1000086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess how sandblasting influences shear bond strength (SBS) between nano-ceramic-resin and two resin cements. Methods: 40 nano-ceramic-resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=20): a control (C) and a test group (S_50) where air abrasion (50 µm, 0.28 MPa,10 s) was applied. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10) according to the applied luting material: a self-etch dual-cure resin cement (LP) and a dual-cure resin cement (LR). SBSs were determined with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were evaluated by a stereomicroscope (25x) and classified into adhesive, cohesive and mixed. One-way ANOVA test (α=.01) was used to establish differences between groups, considering SBS as dependent and the type of surface treatment as independent variable. Results: Mean SBS (MPa) obtained for P were 8.68 ± 1.16 for C and 13.91 ± 2.58 for S_50. Sandblasting positively affected (p<0.01) the self-adhesive cement adhesion to nano-ceramic resin. Group C_LP showed 100% of adhesive fractures, while S_50_LP had some cohesive (20%) and mixed fractures (10%). The fracture pattern of group C_LR was 60% cohesive, 20% adhesive and 20% mixed, while group S_50-LR showed 100% of cohesive failure. Conclusion: Sandblasting is suggested when luting nano-ceramic resin with LP.","PeriodicalId":127691,"journal":{"name":"Bioceramics Development and Applications","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does sandblasting improve bond strength between nano-ceramic resin and two different luting composites?\",\"authors\":\"A. Davide, Augusti Gabriele, Cerutti Francesca, D. Re\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2090-5025.1000086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess how sandblasting influences shear bond strength (SBS) between nano-ceramic-resin and two resin cements. Methods: 40 nano-ceramic-resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=20): a control (C) and a test group (S_50) where air abrasion (50 µm, 0.28 MPa,10 s) was applied. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10) according to the applied luting material: a self-etch dual-cure resin cement (LP) and a dual-cure resin cement (LR). SBSs were determined with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were evaluated by a stereomicroscope (25x) and classified into adhesive, cohesive and mixed. One-way ANOVA test (α=.01) was used to establish differences between groups, considering SBS as dependent and the type of surface treatment as independent variable. Results: Mean SBS (MPa) obtained for P were 8.68 ± 1.16 for C and 13.91 ± 2.58 for S_50. Sandblasting positively affected (p<0.01) the self-adhesive cement adhesion to nano-ceramic resin. Group C_LP showed 100% of adhesive fractures, while S_50_LP had some cohesive (20%) and mixed fractures (10%). The fracture pattern of group C_LR was 60% cohesive, 20% adhesive and 20% mixed, while group S_50-LR showed 100% of cohesive failure. Conclusion: Sandblasting is suggested when luting nano-ceramic resin with LP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioceramics Development and Applications\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioceramics Development and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5025.1000086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioceramics Development and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5025.1000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:探讨喷砂对纳米陶瓷树脂与两种树脂胶结物剪切强度的影响。方法:将40块纳米陶瓷树脂块分为两组(n=20):对照组(C)和试验组(S_50),其中空气磨损(50µm, 0.28 MPa,10 s)。每组根据应用材料分为自蚀刻双固化树脂水泥(LP)和双固化树脂水泥(LR)两亚组(n=10)。采用万能试验机,以0.5 mm/min的十字速度测定SBSs。通过体视显微镜(25倍)评估骨折模式,并将其分为粘连型、内聚型和混合型。以SBS为因变量,表面处理类型为自变量,采用单因素方差分析(α= 0.01)确定组间差异。结果:C和S_50的平均SBS (MPa)分别为8.68±1.16和13.91±2.58。喷砂对自粘水泥与纳米陶瓷树脂的粘附力有显著的正向影响(p<0.01)。C_LP组黏着性骨折100%,S_50_LP组黏着性骨折20%,混合性骨折10%。C_LR组骨折形态为60%粘连、20%粘连和20%混合,S_50-LR组骨折形态为100%粘连破坏。结论:采用LP制备纳米陶瓷树脂时建议喷砂处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does sandblasting improve bond strength between nano-ceramic resin and two different luting composites?
Purpose: To assess how sandblasting influences shear bond strength (SBS) between nano-ceramic-resin and two resin cements. Methods: 40 nano-ceramic-resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=20): a control (C) and a test group (S_50) where air abrasion (50 µm, 0.28 MPa,10 s) was applied. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10) according to the applied luting material: a self-etch dual-cure resin cement (LP) and a dual-cure resin cement (LR). SBSs were determined with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were evaluated by a stereomicroscope (25x) and classified into adhesive, cohesive and mixed. One-way ANOVA test (α=.01) was used to establish differences between groups, considering SBS as dependent and the type of surface treatment as independent variable. Results: Mean SBS (MPa) obtained for P were 8.68 ± 1.16 for C and 13.91 ± 2.58 for S_50. Sandblasting positively affected (p<0.01) the self-adhesive cement adhesion to nano-ceramic resin. Group C_LP showed 100% of adhesive fractures, while S_50_LP had some cohesive (20%) and mixed fractures (10%). The fracture pattern of group C_LR was 60% cohesive, 20% adhesive and 20% mixed, while group S_50-LR showed 100% of cohesive failure. Conclusion: Sandblasting is suggested when luting nano-ceramic resin with LP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信