保留网络的学术一面

Adam Mikeal, Cody Green, A. Maslov, Scott Phillips, J. Leggett
{"title":"保留网络的学术一面","authors":"Adam Mikeal, Cody Green, A. Maslov, Scott Phillips, J. Leggett","doi":"10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results of a case study that addresses many issues surrounding the difficult task of preservation in a digital library. We focus on a subset of these issues as they apply to the preservation of scholarly articles encoded in Web standards. We also describe the two common preservation mechanisms, emulation and migration, as well as our selection of the latter for our particular case. Finally, we compare two approaches to migration, automatic and manual, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in our context. We show that consistent use of open standards leads to more efficient migration processes and issue a \"call to arms\" to the digital preservation community to ensure that scholarly material on the Web can be preserved for future generations","PeriodicalId":339667,"journal":{"name":"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving the Scholarly Side of the Web\",\"authors\":\"Adam Mikeal, Cody Green, A. Maslov, Scott Phillips, J. Leggett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents results of a case study that addresses many issues surrounding the difficult task of preservation in a digital library. We focus on a subset of these issues as they apply to the preservation of scholarly articles encoded in Web standards. We also describe the two common preservation mechanisms, emulation and migration, as well as our selection of the latter for our particular case. Finally, we compare two approaches to migration, automatic and manual, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in our context. We show that consistent use of open standards leads to more efficient migration processes and issue a \\\"call to arms\\\" to the digital preservation community to ensure that scholarly material on the Web can be preserved for future generations\",\"PeriodicalId\":339667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了一个案例研究的结果,该研究解决了围绕数字图书馆保存困难任务的许多问题。我们关注这些问题的一个子集,因为它们适用于保存以Web标准编码的学术文章。我们还描述了两种常见的保存机制,模拟和迁移,以及我们选择后者为我们的特殊情况。最后,我们比较了两种迁移方法,自动和手动,并在我们的上下文中讨论了它们的优缺点。我们展示了开放标准的持续使用会导致更有效的迁移过程,并向数字保存社区发出“武装号召”,以确保网络上的学术材料能够为子孙后代保存下来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserving the Scholarly Side of the Web
This paper presents results of a case study that addresses many issues surrounding the difficult task of preservation in a digital library. We focus on a subset of these issues as they apply to the preservation of scholarly articles encoded in Web standards. We also describe the two common preservation mechanisms, emulation and migration, as well as our selection of the latter for our particular case. Finally, we compare two approaches to migration, automatic and manual, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in our context. We show that consistent use of open standards leads to more efficient migration processes and issue a "call to arms" to the digital preservation community to ensure that scholarly material on the Web can be preserved for future generations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信