英国分权政府和英格兰市长选举中使用的改革后的选举制度

The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.31389/BOOK1.C

Patrick Dunleavy

{"title":"英国分权政府和英格兰市长选举中使用的改革后的选举制度","authors":"Patrick Dunleavy","doi":"10.31389/BOOK1.C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patrick Dunleavy and the Democratic Audit team examine how well citizens are represented by the two main reformed electoral systems used in the UK – the ‘additional members system’ (AMS) and the ‘supplementary vote’ (SV). How successful have they been in showing the way for more modern electoral systems to work well under British political conditions?","PeriodicalId":202478,"journal":{"name":"The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit","volume":"54 57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reformed electoral systems used in Britain’s devolved governments and England’s mayoral elections\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Dunleavy\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/BOOK1.C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patrick Dunleavy and the Democratic Audit team examine how well citizens are represented by the two main reformed electoral systems used in the UK – the ‘additional members system’ (AMS) and the ‘supplementary vote’ (SV). How successful have they been in showing the way for more modern electoral systems to work well under British political conditions?\",\"PeriodicalId\":202478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit\",\"volume\":\"54 57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/BOOK1.C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/BOOK1.C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

帕特里克·邓利维(Patrick Dunleavy)和民主党审计组研究了英国使用的两种主要改革后的选举制度——“额外成员制度”(AMS)和“补充投票”(SV)——如何很好地代表了公民。在为更现代的选举制度在英国政治条件下的良好运作指明道路方面，他们取得了多大的成功?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The reformed electoral systems used in Britain’s devolved governments and England’s mayoral elections

Patrick Dunleavy and the Democratic Audit team examine how well citizens are represented by the two main reformed electoral systems used in the UK – the ‘additional members system’ (AMS) and the ‘supplementary vote’ (SV). How successful have they been in showing the way for more modern electoral systems to work well under British political conditions?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The UK's Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit

自引率

0.00%

发文量