揭露显而易见的事实?一个环境辅助生活项目的回顾性人工制品分析

Itzel Morales-Ramirez, Matthieu Vergne, Mirko Morandini, L. Sabatucci, A. Perini, A. Susi
{"title":"揭露显而易见的事实?一个环境辅助生活项目的回顾性人工制品分析","authors":"Itzel Morales-Ramirez, Matthieu Vergne, Mirko Morandini, L. Sabatucci, A. Perini, A. Susi","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of methods and techniques for requirements elicitation and analysis have been proposed, in response to the diverse needs posed by the different types of information that have to be managed in designing complex software systems. Experience from real projects gives evidence that often these techniques are combined within a project, but which requirements each technique can better contribute to specify, and which information sources are prevalently used during requirements elicitation and validation is poorly documented. In this paper, we describe a retrospective analysis of the requirements engineering process of a project in the domain of ambient assisted living, where several techniques were used to elicit the requirements of a socio-technical system. By empirically analysing the available project documentation, we collect evidences of the type of information that various elicitation techniques can give in a real project, linking initial sources of information to final requirements through different analysis paths. We illustrate the design of this study and present an analysis of the collected data.","PeriodicalId":335310,"journal":{"name":"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing the obvious?: A retrospective artefact analysis for an ambient assisted-living project\",\"authors\":\"Itzel Morales-Ramirez, Matthieu Vergne, Mirko Morandini, L. Sabatucci, A. Perini, A. Susi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A variety of methods and techniques for requirements elicitation and analysis have been proposed, in response to the diverse needs posed by the different types of information that have to be managed in designing complex software systems. Experience from real projects gives evidence that often these techniques are combined within a project, but which requirements each technique can better contribute to specify, and which information sources are prevalently used during requirements elicitation and validation is poorly documented. In this paper, we describe a retrospective analysis of the requirements engineering process of a project in the domain of ambient assisted living, where several techniques were used to elicit the requirements of a socio-technical system. By empirically analysing the available project documentation, we collect evidences of the type of information that various elicitation techniques can give in a real project, linking initial sources of information to final requirements through different analysis paths. We illustrate the design of this study and present an analysis of the collected data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了响应设计复杂软件系统时必须管理的不同类型的信息所带来的不同需求,已经提出了用于需求引出和分析的各种方法和技术。来自实际项目的经验证明,这些技术通常在一个项目中组合在一起,但是每种技术可以更好地为指定哪些需求做出贡献,以及在需求引出和验证期间普遍使用哪些信息源的文档记录很差。在本文中,我们对环境辅助生活领域的一个项目的需求工程过程进行了回顾性分析,其中使用了几种技术来引出社会技术系统的需求。通过经验分析可用的项目文档,我们收集了各种启发技术在真实项目中可以提供的信息类型的证据,通过不同的分析路径将初始信息来源与最终需求联系起来。我们说明了这项研究的设计,并对收集到的数据进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing the obvious?: A retrospective artefact analysis for an ambient assisted-living project
A variety of methods and techniques for requirements elicitation and analysis have been proposed, in response to the diverse needs posed by the different types of information that have to be managed in designing complex software systems. Experience from real projects gives evidence that often these techniques are combined within a project, but which requirements each technique can better contribute to specify, and which information sources are prevalently used during requirements elicitation and validation is poorly documented. In this paper, we describe a retrospective analysis of the requirements engineering process of a project in the domain of ambient assisted living, where several techniques were used to elicit the requirements of a socio-technical system. By empirically analysing the available project documentation, we collect evidences of the type of information that various elicitation techniques can give in a real project, linking initial sources of information to final requirements through different analysis paths. We illustrate the design of this study and present an analysis of the collected data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信