子宫动脉多普勒预测宫内节育器相关月经过多治疗期间甲芬那酸疗效的评估

H. Sammour, S. Ashoush, O. Ibrahim, Y. Essam
{"title":"子宫动脉多普勒预测宫内节育器相关月经过多治疗期间甲芬那酸疗效的评估","authors":"H. Sammour, S. Ashoush, O. Ibrahim, Y. Essam","doi":"10.21608/EBWHJ.2019.19364.1054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bleeding with IUCDs is considered iatrogenic dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The bleeding associated with IUCD use may either occur during menstruation (heavy and/or prolonged) or in the form of intermenstrual bleeding and spotting.Patients and Methods:This study was carried out on 156 women attended the family planning out-patient clinic in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams University Hospitals, during the period from May 2017 to May 2018. Patients were divided according to the response to treatment into two groups: Group (I): Responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid and Group (II): Non-responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid. Response to treatment was evaluated according to: Pictorial blood loss assessment chart.Results: Interpretation of the results of this work showed that uterine artery mean value of the PI of the women who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.54±0.42) were significantly higher than mean value of PI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.96±0.28), also showed that uterine artery mean value of the RI of the who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.01±0.25) were significantly higher than mean values of RI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.71±0.21). Doppler indices showed that pulsatility index ≥ 1.27 had moderate sensitivity (75.3%) and NPV (75.3%) but high specificity (90.1%) and PPV (90.1%) in prediction of responders. Resistive index ≥ 0.93 had low sensitivity (69.4%) and NPV (70.8%) but moderate specificity (88.7%) and PPV (88.1%) in prediction of responders.Conclusion:There is a strong relationship between uterine artery Doppler indices and prediction of response to Mefenamic acid.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the efficacy of uterine artery Doppler in predicting the response to Mefenamic Acid during treatment of women having IUCD associated menorrhagia\",\"authors\":\"H. Sammour, S. Ashoush, O. Ibrahim, Y. Essam\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/EBWHJ.2019.19364.1054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Bleeding with IUCDs is considered iatrogenic dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The bleeding associated with IUCD use may either occur during menstruation (heavy and/or prolonged) or in the form of intermenstrual bleeding and spotting.Patients and Methods:This study was carried out on 156 women attended the family planning out-patient clinic in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams University Hospitals, during the period from May 2017 to May 2018. Patients were divided according to the response to treatment into two groups: Group (I): Responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid and Group (II): Non-responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid. Response to treatment was evaluated according to: Pictorial blood loss assessment chart.Results: Interpretation of the results of this work showed that uterine artery mean value of the PI of the women who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.54±0.42) were significantly higher than mean value of PI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.96±0.28), also showed that uterine artery mean value of the RI of the who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.01±0.25) were significantly higher than mean values of RI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.71±0.21). Doppler indices showed that pulsatility index ≥ 1.27 had moderate sensitivity (75.3%) and NPV (75.3%) but high specificity (90.1%) and PPV (90.1%) in prediction of responders. Resistive index ≥ 0.93 had low sensitivity (69.4%) and NPV (70.8%) but moderate specificity (88.7%) and PPV (88.1%) in prediction of responders.Conclusion:There is a strong relationship between uterine artery Doppler indices and prediction of response to Mefenamic acid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2019.19364.1054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2019.19364.1054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:宫内节育器出血被认为是医源性失调性子宫出血。与使用宫内节育器相关的出血可能发生在月经期间(大量和/或延长),也可能以月经间出血和点滴出血的形式出现。患者与方法:本研究选取2017年5月至2018年5月在Ain-Shams大学附属医院妇产科计划生育门诊就诊的156名妇女为研究对象。根据对治疗的反应将患者分为两组:组(I):甲非那酸治疗有反应,组(II):甲非那酸治疗无反应。治疗效果根据:失血评估图进行评估。结果:对本研究结果的解释表明,甲非那酸治疗有效组(I组)的子宫动脉PI均值(1.54±0.42)显著高于甲非那酸治疗无效组(II组)的PI均值(0.96±0.28);甲非那酸治疗有效组(I组)子宫动脉RI均值(1.01±0.25)显著高于甲非那酸治疗无效组(II组)(0.71±0.21)。多普勒指标显示,脉搏指数≥1.27预测应答者的灵敏度(75.3%)和NPV(75.3%)中等,但特异性(90.1%)和PPV(90.1%)较高。耐药指数≥0.93预测应答者的敏感性(69.4%)和NPV(70.8%)较低,特异性(88.7%)和PPV(88.1%)中等。结论:子宫动脉多普勒指数与预测甲氧胺酸反应有密切关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the efficacy of uterine artery Doppler in predicting the response to Mefenamic Acid during treatment of women having IUCD associated menorrhagia
Background: Bleeding with IUCDs is considered iatrogenic dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The bleeding associated with IUCD use may either occur during menstruation (heavy and/or prolonged) or in the form of intermenstrual bleeding and spotting.Patients and Methods:This study was carried out on 156 women attended the family planning out-patient clinic in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams University Hospitals, during the period from May 2017 to May 2018. Patients were divided according to the response to treatment into two groups: Group (I): Responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid and Group (II): Non-responders to treatment with Mefenamic acid. Response to treatment was evaluated according to: Pictorial blood loss assessment chart.Results: Interpretation of the results of this work showed that uterine artery mean value of the PI of the women who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.54±0.42) were significantly higher than mean value of PI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.96±0.28), also showed that uterine artery mean value of the RI of the who responded to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group I) (1.01±0.25) were significantly higher than mean values of RI of women who didn’t respond to treatment with Mefenamic acid (group II) (0.71±0.21). Doppler indices showed that pulsatility index ≥ 1.27 had moderate sensitivity (75.3%) and NPV (75.3%) but high specificity (90.1%) and PPV (90.1%) in prediction of responders. Resistive index ≥ 0.93 had low sensitivity (69.4%) and NPV (70.8%) but moderate specificity (88.7%) and PPV (88.1%) in prediction of responders.Conclusion:There is a strong relationship between uterine artery Doppler indices and prediction of response to Mefenamic acid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信