俄罗斯侵略乌克兰:国际社会与国际法两种观点的冲突

C. Mik
{"title":"俄罗斯侵略乌克兰:国际社会与国际法两种观点的冲突","authors":"C. Mik","doi":"10.21697/2022.12.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russia's aggression against Ukraine represents the culmination of a clash between two visions of the international community and international law. The first is the vision of the West, formulated especially under the influence of the United States. This vision is reflected in the current situation of the community, which is based on American hegemony, and in the state of international law, which has emerged especially after the end of the Cold War. The second vision is that of Russia and China, which has been systematically constructed since the end of the 20th century, supported at least in some aspects by other states belonging to or aspiring to the BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. The article undertakes an analysis from the perspective of the response of the West and, more broadly, the international community, to Russian aggression. It examines demands for change in the sphere of power within the community and relations between its members, as well as changes in the creation, interpretation and operation of international law. The consequences of the clash of these visions, which is of a systemic, civilisational nature with regard to both the community and international law, are also assessed.","PeriodicalId":269602,"journal":{"name":"Polish Review of International and European Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia’s Aggression against Ukraine: a Clash of Two Visions of the International Community and International Law\",\"authors\":\"C. Mik\",\"doi\":\"10.21697/2022.12.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Russia's aggression against Ukraine represents the culmination of a clash between two visions of the international community and international law. The first is the vision of the West, formulated especially under the influence of the United States. This vision is reflected in the current situation of the community, which is based on American hegemony, and in the state of international law, which has emerged especially after the end of the Cold War. The second vision is that of Russia and China, which has been systematically constructed since the end of the 20th century, supported at least in some aspects by other states belonging to or aspiring to the BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. The article undertakes an analysis from the perspective of the response of the West and, more broadly, the international community, to Russian aggression. It examines demands for change in the sphere of power within the community and relations between its members, as well as changes in the creation, interpretation and operation of international law. The consequences of the clash of these visions, which is of a systemic, civilisational nature with regard to both the community and international law, are also assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Review of International and European Law\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Review of International and European Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.12.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Review of International and European Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.12.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯对乌克兰的侵略是国际社会和国际法两种观点之间冲突的顶点。首先是西方的愿景,特别是在美国的影响下形成的。这一设想反映在以美国霸权为基础的国际社会的现状中,也反映在特别是在冷战结束后出现的国际法状况中。第二种愿景是俄罗斯和中国的愿景,这种愿景自20世纪末以来一直在系统地构建,至少在某些方面得到了金砖国家或上海合作组织(Shanghai Cooperation Organisation)成员国或有意加入的其他国家的支持。本文从西方乃至更广泛的国际社会对俄罗斯侵略的反应角度进行了分析。它审查了对改变国际社会内部权力范围及其成员之间关系的要求,以及国际法的制定、解释和实施方面的变化。这些观点的冲突在社会和国际法方面都具有系统的、文明的性质,对其后果也进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Russia’s Aggression against Ukraine: a Clash of Two Visions of the International Community and International Law
Russia's aggression against Ukraine represents the culmination of a clash between two visions of the international community and international law. The first is the vision of the West, formulated especially under the influence of the United States. This vision is reflected in the current situation of the community, which is based on American hegemony, and in the state of international law, which has emerged especially after the end of the Cold War. The second vision is that of Russia and China, which has been systematically constructed since the end of the 20th century, supported at least in some aspects by other states belonging to or aspiring to the BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. The article undertakes an analysis from the perspective of the response of the West and, more broadly, the international community, to Russian aggression. It examines demands for change in the sphere of power within the community and relations between its members, as well as changes in the creation, interpretation and operation of international law. The consequences of the clash of these visions, which is of a systemic, civilisational nature with regard to both the community and international law, are also assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信