考虑地震效应的多层后张拉楼板造价评估

O. Abdelaziz, H. Abdalla
{"title":"考虑地震效应的多层后张拉楼板造价评估","authors":"O. Abdelaziz, H. Abdalla","doi":"10.38027/iccaua2021280n5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, many owners and consultants prefer to use post-tensioned PT slab systems in multi-storey buildings due to their considerable savings in materials, labor, and time. On the other hand, many contractors still use the traditional RC flat slab systems due to their simple construction process. This research focuses on the comparison between the two systems taking into consideration: cost, time, and structural behavior. Detailed cost and time analysis is performed for each system considering all construction resources. The analysis and design of the buildings are conducted using many structural and project management computer programs. These include ETABS, SAFE, RAM, REVIT, and Primavera. The results indicated that, PT systems provide significant savings for spans larger than 6 m. The structural analysis of both systems also showed that PT slabs are more effective in resisting seismic straining actions.","PeriodicalId":424009,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Article","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Evaluation of Post-tensioned Slabs in Multi-storey Buildings Considering Seismic Effect\",\"authors\":\"O. Abdelaziz, H. Abdalla\",\"doi\":\"10.38027/iccaua2021280n5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, many owners and consultants prefer to use post-tensioned PT slab systems in multi-storey buildings due to their considerable savings in materials, labor, and time. On the other hand, many contractors still use the traditional RC flat slab systems due to their simple construction process. This research focuses on the comparison between the two systems taking into consideration: cost, time, and structural behavior. Detailed cost and time analysis is performed for each system considering all construction resources. The analysis and design of the buildings are conducted using many structural and project management computer programs. These include ETABS, SAFE, RAM, REVIT, and Primavera. The results indicated that, PT systems provide significant savings for spans larger than 6 m. The structural analysis of both systems also showed that PT slabs are more effective in resisting seismic straining actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Article\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Article\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2021280n5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Article","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2021280n5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,许多业主和顾问更喜欢在多层建筑中使用后张拉PT板系统,因为这样可以节省大量的材料、劳动力和时间。另一方面,由于其施工过程简单,许多承包商仍然使用传统的钢筋混凝土平板系统。本研究的重点是考虑成本、时间和结构性能的两种系统的比较。考虑到所有建筑资源,对每个系统进行了详细的成本和时间分析。建筑物的分析和设计是使用许多结构和项目管理计算机程序进行的。这些包括ETABS, SAFE, RAM, REVIT和Primavera。结果表明,对于大于6 m的跨度,PT系统具有显著的节约效果。两种体系的结构分析也表明,PT板在抵抗地震应变作用方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Evaluation of Post-tensioned Slabs in Multi-storey Buildings Considering Seismic Effect
Currently, many owners and consultants prefer to use post-tensioned PT slab systems in multi-storey buildings due to their considerable savings in materials, labor, and time. On the other hand, many contractors still use the traditional RC flat slab systems due to their simple construction process. This research focuses on the comparison between the two systems taking into consideration: cost, time, and structural behavior. Detailed cost and time analysis is performed for each system considering all construction resources. The analysis and design of the buildings are conducted using many structural and project management computer programs. These include ETABS, SAFE, RAM, REVIT, and Primavera. The results indicated that, PT systems provide significant savings for spans larger than 6 m. The structural analysis of both systems also showed that PT slabs are more effective in resisting seismic straining actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信