跨国电子证据收集:欧盟面临的挑战和前景

Olga Marandici, Stefan Milicenco, Cristian Iordan, Armen Oganesean
{"title":"跨国电子证据收集:欧盟面临的挑战和前景","authors":"Olga Marandici, Stefan Milicenco, Cristian Iordan, Armen Oganesean","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.3(62).08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-known that transnational data flows are rising simultaneously with the increasing use of social media, webmail, messaging services, and apps to communicate, work, socialize and gain information, unfortunately, including also unlawful purposes. Criminal procedural measures for gathering evidence as part of a criminal investigation are usually national in scope, but obtaining electronic evidence often has cross-border implications. Courts and legislatures have often failed to keep pace with rapid advances in digital technology and computer software capabilities. This paper analyzes the European legal framework for the transnational gathering of electronic evidence in Europe. Initially, it argues the challenges of the cross-border gathering of electronic evidence in criminal investigations.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transnational gathering of electronic evidences: challenges and perspectives in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Olga Marandici, Stefan Milicenco, Cristian Iordan, Armen Oganesean\",\"doi\":\"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.3(62).08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-known that transnational data flows are rising simultaneously with the increasing use of social media, webmail, messaging services, and apps to communicate, work, socialize and gain information, unfortunately, including also unlawful purposes. Criminal procedural measures for gathering evidence as part of a criminal investigation are usually national in scope, but obtaining electronic evidence often has cross-border implications. Courts and legislatures have often failed to keep pace with rapid advances in digital technology and computer software capabilities. This paper analyzes the European legal framework for the transnational gathering of electronic evidence in Europe. Initially, it argues the challenges of the cross-border gathering of electronic evidence in criminal investigations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.3(62).08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.3(62).08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,随着越来越多地使用社交媒体、网络邮件、短信服务和应用程序进行沟通、工作、社交和获取信息,跨国数据流也在增加,不幸的是,其中也包括非法目的。作为刑事调查的一部分,收集证据的刑事程序措施通常在国家范围内,但获取电子证据往往具有跨境影响。法院和立法机构常常跟不上数字技术和计算机软件能力的快速发展。本文分析了欧洲跨国电子证据收集的法律框架。首先,它论述了在刑事调查中跨境收集电子证据所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transnational gathering of electronic evidences: challenges and perspectives in the European Union
It is well-known that transnational data flows are rising simultaneously with the increasing use of social media, webmail, messaging services, and apps to communicate, work, socialize and gain information, unfortunately, including also unlawful purposes. Criminal procedural measures for gathering evidence as part of a criminal investigation are usually national in scope, but obtaining electronic evidence often has cross-border implications. Courts and legislatures have often failed to keep pace with rapid advances in digital technology and computer software capabilities. This paper analyzes the European legal framework for the transnational gathering of electronic evidence in Europe. Initially, it argues the challenges of the cross-border gathering of electronic evidence in criminal investigations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信