个人健康保险市场健康计划选择的惯性来源

Coleman Drake, Conor Ryan, B. Dowd
{"title":"个人健康保险市场健康计划选择的惯性来源","authors":"Coleman Drake, Conor Ryan, B. Dowd","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3556857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We decompose inertia in health plan choice in the individual health insurance market into three sources: inattention to alternatives, hassle costs related to switching, and tastes for provider continuity. Administrative 2014-2018 data from California’s Health Insurance Marketplace show that 83% of returning households select their default health plans. Using a default-consideration framework, we find that roughly three quarters of default plan selections are due to inertia, nearly 90% of which are due to inattention, hassle costs, and their interaction with one another. We validate our identification of inattention using information on whether households made active plan selections.","PeriodicalId":177602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sources of Inertia in Health Plan Choice in the Individual Health Insurance Market\",\"authors\":\"Coleman Drake, Conor Ryan, B. Dowd\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3556857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We decompose inertia in health plan choice in the individual health insurance market into three sources: inattention to alternatives, hassle costs related to switching, and tastes for provider continuity. Administrative 2014-2018 data from California’s Health Insurance Marketplace show that 83% of returning households select their default health plans. Using a default-consideration framework, we find that roughly three quarters of default plan selections are due to inertia, nearly 90% of which are due to inattention, hassle costs, and their interaction with one another. We validate our identification of inattention using information on whether households made active plan selections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们将个人健康保险市场中健康计划选择的惯性分解为三个来源:对替代方案的忽视,与转换相关的麻烦成本,以及对提供者连续性的偏好。加州健康保险市场2014-2018年的行政数据显示,83%的回归家庭选择了默认的健康计划。使用默认考虑框架,我们发现大约四分之三的默认计划选择是由于惯性,近90%是由于不注意、麻烦成本和它们之间的相互作用。我们使用家庭是否做出积极计划选择的信息来验证我们对注意力不集中的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sources of Inertia in Health Plan Choice in the Individual Health Insurance Market
We decompose inertia in health plan choice in the individual health insurance market into three sources: inattention to alternatives, hassle costs related to switching, and tastes for provider continuity. Administrative 2014-2018 data from California’s Health Insurance Marketplace show that 83% of returning households select their default health plans. Using a default-consideration framework, we find that roughly three quarters of default plan selections are due to inertia, nearly 90% of which are due to inattention, hassle costs, and their interaction with one another. We validate our identification of inattention using information on whether households made active plan selections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信