在具有挑战性的医疗保健相关环境中系统选择身份验证机制的矩阵

Michael Grabatin, M. Steinke, Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel
{"title":"在具有挑战性的医疗保健相关环境中系统选择身份验证机制的矩阵","authors":"Michael Grabatin, M. Steinke, Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel","doi":"10.1145/3445969.3450424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passwords continue to dominate the authentication landscape, while One Time Passwords (OTPs) provided by apps are increasingly used as second factor. Even though several alternatives are developed, very few regard usability. Even fewer alternatives consider special conditions of authentication, like disabilities and other input restrictions, typical for healthcare workers. In this paper, we show shortcomings by the example of different stages within the care cycle. Generalized requirements are used to evaluate existing authentication mechanisms. These findings result in the design of a matrix showing different authentication methods and requirements. The matrix can be used to identify the best fitting authentication mechanisms based on the needs of the scenario. Not only the first factor can be identified, but the matrix also helps to select additional well-fitting authentication mechanism for a specific scenario. The designed matrix is practically underlined by applying it to the care cycle with different cyber-physical systems (CPS).","PeriodicalId":103324,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Matrix for Systematic Selection of Authentication Mechanisms in Challenging Healthcare related Environments\",\"authors\":\"Michael Grabatin, M. Steinke, Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3445969.3450424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Passwords continue to dominate the authentication landscape, while One Time Passwords (OTPs) provided by apps are increasingly used as second factor. Even though several alternatives are developed, very few regard usability. Even fewer alternatives consider special conditions of authentication, like disabilities and other input restrictions, typical for healthcare workers. In this paper, we show shortcomings by the example of different stages within the care cycle. Generalized requirements are used to evaluate existing authentication mechanisms. These findings result in the design of a matrix showing different authentication methods and requirements. The matrix can be used to identify the best fitting authentication mechanisms based on the needs of the scenario. Not only the first factor can be identified, but the matrix also helps to select additional well-fitting authentication mechanism for a specific scenario. The designed matrix is practically underlined by applying it to the care cycle with different cyber-physical systems (CPS).\",\"PeriodicalId\":103324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3445969.3450424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3445969.3450424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

密码继续在身份验证领域占据主导地位,而应用程序提供的一次性密码(otp)越来越多地被用作第二个因素。尽管开发了几种替代方案,但很少考虑可用性。甚至更少的替代方案考虑到特殊的身份验证条件,如残疾和其他输入限制,这是医疗保健工作者的典型情况。在本文中,我们通过护理周期内不同阶段的例子来说明不足之处。通用需求用于评估现有的身份验证机制。这些发现导致了一个矩阵的设计,显示了不同的身份验证方法和需求。该矩阵可用于根据场景的需要确定最合适的身份验证机制。不仅可以识别第一个因素,而且矩阵还有助于为特定场景选择其他非常适合的身份验证机制。通过将设计的矩阵应用于不同的网络物理系统(CPS)的护理周期,实际上强调了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Matrix for Systematic Selection of Authentication Mechanisms in Challenging Healthcare related Environments
Passwords continue to dominate the authentication landscape, while One Time Passwords (OTPs) provided by apps are increasingly used as second factor. Even though several alternatives are developed, very few regard usability. Even fewer alternatives consider special conditions of authentication, like disabilities and other input restrictions, typical for healthcare workers. In this paper, we show shortcomings by the example of different stages within the care cycle. Generalized requirements are used to evaluate existing authentication mechanisms. These findings result in the design of a matrix showing different authentication methods and requirements. The matrix can be used to identify the best fitting authentication mechanisms based on the needs of the scenario. Not only the first factor can be identified, but the matrix also helps to select additional well-fitting authentication mechanism for a specific scenario. The designed matrix is practically underlined by applying it to the care cycle with different cyber-physical systems (CPS).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信