V. Gouveia, Maria Gabriela Costa Ribeiro, Gleidson Diego Lopes Loureto, Olindina Fernandes da Silva Neta, R. Gouveia, Roosevelt Vilar, Sandra Freire
{"title":"积极与消极不良情绪量表(EAPN-10):其心理测量充分性的证据","authors":"V. Gouveia, Maria Gabriela Costa Ribeiro, Gleidson Diego Lopes Loureto, Olindina Fernandes da Silva Neta, R. Gouveia, Roosevelt Vilar, Sandra Freire","doi":"10.9788/TP2019.1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to gather psychometric evidence of the Scale of Positive and Negative Aff ects (EAPN10) within the Brazilian context. Three studies were performed (N = 911). Study 1 considered 296 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.8; 59.1% females), who answered the EAPN-10 and a demographic questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure [positive aff ects (α = .82) and negative aff ects (α = .81)], explaining 59.7% of the total variance. Study 2 took into account the participation of 313 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.3; 57.2% females), who answered the same instruments. Confi rmatory factor analysis corroborated the two-factor structure (e.g., CFI = .92), which was invariant across males and females (e.g., ΔCFI < .01), with alphas greater than .70. Finally, Study 3’s participants were 302 university students (MAge = 23.1; 54.3% females), who answered the aforementioned instruments as well as measures of vitality, positivity, optimism, anxiety, depression and stress. Supporting their criterion validity, positive aff ects (α = .83) were positively correlated Gouveia, V. V. , Ribeiro, M. G. C., Loureto, G. D. L., Silva Neta, O. F., Gouveia, R. S. V., Vilar, R., Freire, S. E. A. 190 Trends Psychol., Ribeirão Preto, vol. 27, no 1, p. 189-203 March/2019 with well-being indicators, and negative aff ects (α = .80) were positively correlated with indicators of psychological discomfort. In conclusion, the EAPN-10 is a psychometrically adequate measure that can be employed to assess people’s aff ects and their correlates within the Brazilian context.","PeriodicalId":142063,"journal":{"name":"Temas em Psicologia","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale of Positive and Negative Aff ects (EAPN-10): Evidence of its Psychometric Adequacy\",\"authors\":\"V. Gouveia, Maria Gabriela Costa Ribeiro, Gleidson Diego Lopes Loureto, Olindina Fernandes da Silva Neta, R. Gouveia, Roosevelt Vilar, Sandra Freire\",\"doi\":\"10.9788/TP2019.1-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to gather psychometric evidence of the Scale of Positive and Negative Aff ects (EAPN10) within the Brazilian context. Three studies were performed (N = 911). Study 1 considered 296 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.8; 59.1% females), who answered the EAPN-10 and a demographic questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure [positive aff ects (α = .82) and negative aff ects (α = .81)], explaining 59.7% of the total variance. Study 2 took into account the participation of 313 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.3; 57.2% females), who answered the same instruments. Confi rmatory factor analysis corroborated the two-factor structure (e.g., CFI = .92), which was invariant across males and females (e.g., ΔCFI < .01), with alphas greater than .70. Finally, Study 3’s participants were 302 university students (MAge = 23.1; 54.3% females), who answered the aforementioned instruments as well as measures of vitality, positivity, optimism, anxiety, depression and stress. Supporting their criterion validity, positive aff ects (α = .83) were positively correlated Gouveia, V. V. , Ribeiro, M. G. C., Loureto, G. D. L., Silva Neta, O. F., Gouveia, R. S. V., Vilar, R., Freire, S. E. A. 190 Trends Psychol., Ribeirão Preto, vol. 27, no 1, p. 189-203 March/2019 with well-being indicators, and negative aff ects (α = .80) were positively correlated with indicators of psychological discomfort. In conclusion, the EAPN-10 is a psychometrically adequate measure that can be employed to assess people’s aff ects and their correlates within the Brazilian context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"volume\":\"487 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temas em Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究旨在收集巴西背景下积极和消极负面负面情绪量表(EAPN10)的心理测量证据。共进行了3项研究(N = 911)。研究1纳入296名本科生(MAge = 23.8;59.1%女性),她们分别回答了EAPN-10和一份人口调查问卷。探索性因子分析显示,两因素结构[正面效应(α = 0.82)和负面效应(α = 0.81)]解释总方差的59.7%。研究2考虑了313名本科生的参与(MAge = 23.3;57.2%女性),她们回答了相同的问题。验证性因子分析证实了双因素结构(例如,CFI = 0.92),该结构在男性和女性之间是不变的(例如,ΔCFI < 0.01), alpha大于0.70。最后,研究3的参与者是302名大学生(MAge = 23.1;54.3%女性),她们回答了上述问题以及活力、积极性、乐观、焦虑、抑郁和压力方面的问题。古维雅,V. V., Ribeiro, M. G. C., Loureto, G. D. L., Silva Neta, O. F.,古维雅,R. S. V., Vilar, R., Freire, S. E. A. [j]。, ribebe o Preto, vol. 27, no . 1, p. 189-203, 2019年3月,幸福感指标,负负面影响(α = 0.80)与心理不适指标正相关。总之,EAPN-10是一种心理计量学上足够的测量方法,可以用来评估人们的影响及其在巴西背景下的相关性。
Scale of Positive and Negative Aff ects (EAPN-10): Evidence of its Psychometric Adequacy
This study aimed to gather psychometric evidence of the Scale of Positive and Negative Aff ects (EAPN10) within the Brazilian context. Three studies were performed (N = 911). Study 1 considered 296 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.8; 59.1% females), who answered the EAPN-10 and a demographic questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure [positive aff ects (α = .82) and negative aff ects (α = .81)], explaining 59.7% of the total variance. Study 2 took into account the participation of 313 undergraduate students (MAge = 23.3; 57.2% females), who answered the same instruments. Confi rmatory factor analysis corroborated the two-factor structure (e.g., CFI = .92), which was invariant across males and females (e.g., ΔCFI < .01), with alphas greater than .70. Finally, Study 3’s participants were 302 university students (MAge = 23.1; 54.3% females), who answered the aforementioned instruments as well as measures of vitality, positivity, optimism, anxiety, depression and stress. Supporting their criterion validity, positive aff ects (α = .83) were positively correlated Gouveia, V. V. , Ribeiro, M. G. C., Loureto, G. D. L., Silva Neta, O. F., Gouveia, R. S. V., Vilar, R., Freire, S. E. A. 190 Trends Psychol., Ribeirão Preto, vol. 27, no 1, p. 189-203 March/2019 with well-being indicators, and negative aff ects (α = .80) were positively correlated with indicators of psychological discomfort. In conclusion, the EAPN-10 is a psychometrically adequate measure that can be employed to assess people’s aff ects and their correlates within the Brazilian context.