论诉因选择背景下诉讼权利的行使

A. A. Tokareva
{"title":"论诉因选择背景下诉讼权利的行使","authors":"A. A. Tokareva","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-8-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies the legal nature of the right to claim in the aspect of the unity of substantive and procedural features. In addition, the right to choose a claim is disclosed in cases of competition of claims, which is important not only in theoretical but also in practical terms. In order to form a comprehensive understanding of the essence of the right to claim and its implementation in the competition of claims, general scientific and private law (historical-legal, formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods are used. It is proved that the right to claim is a complex category, the content of which includes the right to sue (first) and the right to satisfy a claim (second) as different but correlative concepts. It is noted that the uniqueness of both powers of claim is manifested in the conditions (prerequisites) for their occurrence and implementation, which are divided into general (universal) and special. In addition, the issue of the exercise of the right to claim in the context of competition of claims is raised, the criteria for choosing the appropriate method for the protection of violated or disputed rights and interests protected by law are highlighted. It is concluded that leveling the competition of claims requires the development of a special, most effective strategy for exercising the right to claim.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Exercise of the Right of Suit in the Context if the Choice of Cause of Action\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Tokareva\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-8-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article studies the legal nature of the right to claim in the aspect of the unity of substantive and procedural features. In addition, the right to choose a claim is disclosed in cases of competition of claims, which is important not only in theoretical but also in practical terms. In order to form a comprehensive understanding of the essence of the right to claim and its implementation in the competition of claims, general scientific and private law (historical-legal, formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods are used. It is proved that the right to claim is a complex category, the content of which includes the right to sue (first) and the right to satisfy a claim (second) as different but correlative concepts. It is noted that the uniqueness of both powers of claim is manifested in the conditions (prerequisites) for their occurrence and implementation, which are divided into general (universal) and special. In addition, the issue of the exercise of the right to claim in the context of competition of claims is raised, the criteria for choosing the appropriate method for the protection of violated or disputed rights and interests protected by law are highlighted. It is concluded that leveling the competition of claims requires the development of a special, most effective strategy for exercising the right to claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-8-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-8-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从实体特征与程序特征相统一的角度对请求权的法律性质进行了研究。此外,在债权竞争案件中披露债权选择权,这不仅在理论上具有重要意义,而且在实践中也具有重要意义。为了全面理解请求权的本质及其在请求权竞争中的实施,使用了一般科学法和私法(历史法、形式法、比较法)方法。事实证明,请求权是一个复杂的范畴,其内容包括请求权(第一)和请求权(第二)两个不同但相互关联的概念。需要指出的是,这两种权利要求的独特性表现在其发生和实施的条件(先决条件)上,这些条件分为一般(普遍)和特殊。此外,还提出了请求权在请求权竞争背景下的行使问题,强调了对受法律保护的被侵犯或有争议的权益选择适当保护方法的标准。最后得出的结论是,平衡债权竞争需要制定一种特殊的、最有效的战略来行使债权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Exercise of the Right of Suit in the Context if the Choice of Cause of Action
The article studies the legal nature of the right to claim in the aspect of the unity of substantive and procedural features. In addition, the right to choose a claim is disclosed in cases of competition of claims, which is important not only in theoretical but also in practical terms. In order to form a comprehensive understanding of the essence of the right to claim and its implementation in the competition of claims, general scientific and private law (historical-legal, formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods are used. It is proved that the right to claim is a complex category, the content of which includes the right to sue (first) and the right to satisfy a claim (second) as different but correlative concepts. It is noted that the uniqueness of both powers of claim is manifested in the conditions (prerequisites) for their occurrence and implementation, which are divided into general (universal) and special. In addition, the issue of the exercise of the right to claim in the context of competition of claims is raised, the criteria for choosing the appropriate method for the protection of violated or disputed rights and interests protected by law are highlighted. It is concluded that leveling the competition of claims requires the development of a special, most effective strategy for exercising the right to claim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信